§Why CasetextPricing

Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County et al v. County of Sonoma et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION for Protective Order ;REQUEST TO RESOLVE THRESHOLD DISCOVERY ISSUES RE APPLICABILITY OF IQBAL

10 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 260,142 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 273,590 times   368 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

  3. Associated General Contractors v. Carpenters

    459 U.S. 519 (1983)   Cited 5,126 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union lacked standing to sue for injuries passed on to it by intermediaries

  4. Famolare, Inc. v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc.

    525 F. Supp. 940 (E.D. Cal. 1981)   Cited 179 times
    Finding a Rule 12(e) motion proper "only where the complaint is so indefinite that the defendant cannot ascertain the nature of the claim being asserted"

  5. Albion International, Inc. v. American Intl. Chemical

    Case No. 2:07-CV-994 CW (D. Utah May. 28, 2009)

    Case No. 2:07-CV-994 CW. May 28, 2009 ORDER and MEMORANDUM DECISION CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge Now before the court is Defendant AMT Labs, Inc.'s objection to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells' order denying in part AMT's motion for a protective order (Dkt. No. 54). For the reasons discussed below, AMT's objection is SUSTAINED and the court modifies the order as specified. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Albion International, Inc. markets mineral products. Albion has sued various defendants, including AMT

  6. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,547 times   131 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely

  7. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,441 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"

  8. Section 1

    Cal. Const. art. V § 1   Cited 58 times

    The supreme executive power of this State is vested in the Governor. The Governor shall see that the law is faithfully executed. Cal. Const. art. V § 1

  9. Section 7 - Exercise of power or duty imposed upon public officer

    Cal. Gov. Code § 7   Cited 41 times

    Whenever a power is granted to, or a duty is imposed upon, a public officer, the power may be exercised or the duty may be performed by a deputy of the officer or by a person authorized, pursuant to law, by the officer, unless this code expressly provides otherwise. Ca. Gov. Code § 7 Enacted by Stats. 1943, Ch. 134. See Stats 2003 ch 11 (SB X1-29), s 1.

  10. Section 24100 - Law conferring powers, imposing duties or liabilities includes deputies

    Cal. Gov. Code § 24100   Cited 10 times

    Whenever the official name of any principal officer is used in any law conferring power or imposing duties or liabilities, it includes deputies. Ca. Gov. Code § 24100 Added by Stats. 1947, Ch. 424.