38 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 255,314 times   280 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 269,063 times   367 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Harris v. Mills

    572 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 6,628 times
    Holding that notice and opportunity to be heard before deprivation of constitutionally protected interest coupled with Article 78 post-deprivation remedy satisfied due process
  4. Cortec Indus., Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P.

    949 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 2,981 times
    Holding that "[w]here plaintiff has actual notice of all the information in the movant's papers and has relied upon these documents in framing the complaint the necessity of translating a Rule 12(b) motion into one under Rule 56 is largely dissipated" and affirming the district court's consideration of a stock purchase agreement, offering memorandum, and stock warrant that were "integral to [plaintiffs'] complaint"
  5. Boykin v. Keycorp

    521 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 1,331 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a plaintiff proceeds pro se, the district court "is obliged to construe his pleadings liberally" and noting that "the dismissal of a pro se claim as insufficiently pleaded is appropriate only in the most unsustainable of cases."
  6. Selevan v. New York Thruway Authority

    584 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 374 times
    Finding that plaintiffs had adequately articulated Article III injury by alleging that they have paid higher tolls as a result of defendant's policy
  7. Commissioner of Labor v. C.J.M. Services, Inc.

    268 Conn. 283 (Conn. 2004)   Cited 376 times
    In C.J.M. Servs., the Commissioner sued a general contractor on behalf of employees of a subcontractor to collect unpaid wages pursuant to his authority under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-72.
  8. I. Meyer Pincus Assoc. v. Oppenheimer Co.

    936 F.2d 759 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 340 times
    Holding that court could consider prospectus containing alleged misrepresentations, even though plaintiff "fail[ed] to submit the prospectus as an exhibit to the complaint"
  9. Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.

    252 Conn. 153 (Conn. 2000)   Cited 264 times
    Holding that statutory remedy set forth in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-51(b) precluded common law wrongful discharge claim
  10. Schachter v. Citigroup Inc.

    47 Cal.4th 610 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 170 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Concluding in dicta that "the shares of restricted stock issued to [plaintiff] also constituted a wage"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 348,617 times   930 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 162 - Trade or business expenses

    26 U.S.C. § 162   Cited 3,615 times   180 Legal Analyses
    Denying deductions for illegal bribes, kickbacks, etc.
  13. Section 31-72 - Civil action to collect wage claim, fringe benefit claim or arbitration award

    Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-72   Cited 157 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting recovery of unpaid wages
  14. Section 31-71a - Payment of wages: Definitions

    Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-71a   Cited 71 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Defining "employer" for purposes of wage collection as including "any individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust, corporation . . . employing any person
  15. Section 31-69a - Additional penalty

    Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-69a   Cited 2 times   2 Legal Analyses

    (a) In addition to the penalties provided in this chapter and chapter 568, any employer, officer, agent or other person who violates any provision of this chapter, chapter 557 or subsection (g) of section 31-288 shall be liable to the Labor Department for a civil penalty of three hundred dollars for each violation of said chapters and for each violation of subsection (g) of section 31-288, except that (1) any person who violates (A) a stop work order issued pursuant to subsection (c) of section 31-76a

  16. Section 31-1 - Labor Department. Commissioner

    Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-1

    There shall be a Labor Department. The department head shall be the Labor Commissioner, who shall be appointed by the Governor in accordance with the provisions of sections 4-5, 4-6, 4-7 and 4-8. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-1 (1949 Rev., S. 3745; March, 1950, S. 2023d; P.A. 77-614, S. 476, 610.) Cited. 132 C. 533.

  17. Section 1.162-27 - Certain employee remuneration in excess of $1,000,000 not deductible for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1994, and for taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2018

    26 C.F.R. § 1.162-27   Cited 13 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining the chief executive officer of a publicly-held corporation as an employee for tax purposes