§Why CasetextPricing

Colorado Outfitters Association et al v. Hickenlooper

MOTION for Leave to Motion To File Amicus Curiae Brief In Opposition To Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Sheriff's As Plaintiffs Acting in Their Official Capacity

3 Cited authorities

  1. Bristol v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Clear Creek

    312 F.3d 1213 (10th Cir. 2002)   Cited 239 times
    Holding that because a "Board lacks the power to control the hiring, termination, or supervision of a Sheriff's employees, or otherwise control the terms and conditions of their employment, there can be no basis upon which a jury could determine that the Board owes a [duty to provide accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act]."

  2. Tunget v. Board, Cty. Comm., Delta

    992 P.2d 650 (Colo. App. 2000)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that the sheriff, not the county or board of commissioners, was liable for injuries resulting from the sheriff's employees' negligence because "[t]he sheriff, not the county or the Board, has the right of control with respect to the [sheriff's] deputies"

  3. Section 18-12-302 - Large-capacity magazines prohibited - penalties - exceptions

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-302   Cited 6 times

    (1) (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, on and after July 1, 2013, a person who sells, transfers, or possesses a large-capacity magazine commits a class 2 misdemeanor. (b) Repealed. (c) Any person who violates this subsection (1) commits a class 6 felony if the person possessed a large-capacity magazine during the commission of a felony or any crime of violence, as defined in section 18-1.3-406. (2) (a) A person may possess a large-capacity magazine if he or she: (I) Owns the large-capacity