§Why CasetextPricing

Color Kinetics Incorporated v. TIR Systems Ltd.

Opposition re MOTION for Protective Order

8 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. Nachamie

    91 F. Supp. 2d 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)   Cited 75 times
    Holding that Government lacked standing to quash rule 17(c) subpoenas issued by the defendant to third parties

  2. Linder v. Department of Defense

    133 F.3d 17 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 76 times
    Explaining that the plaintiffs "filed a wrongful death action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida"

  3. Thomas v. Marina Associates

    202 F.R.D. 433 (E.D. Pa. 2001)   Cited 66 times
    Denying motion to quash subpoenas directed to expert

  4. In re PE Corp. Secs. Litig

    221 F.R.D. 20 (D. Conn. 2003)   Cited 26 times
    Discussing relevancy in the context of discovery generally and finding the discovery sought relevant when viewed in relation to the allegations in the complaint

  5. Composition Roofers Union Local 30 Welfare Trust Fund v. Graveley Roofing Enterprises, Inc.

    160 F.R.D. 70 (E.D. Pa. 1995)   Cited 30 times
    Holding a subpoena with a time period of twenty months is not unduly burdensome

  6. Bulkmatic Transport Company, Inc. v. Pappas

    99 Civ. 12070 (RMB) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2001)   Cited 17 times
    Denying a motion to disqualify where the allegations were "too vague and conclusory to meet the heightened burden of proof required for a motion to disqualify"

  7. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,276 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"

  8. Section 271 - Infringement of patent

    35 U.S.C. § 271   Cited 6,080 times   1063 Legal Analyses
    Holding that testing is a "use"