106 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 60,305 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment
  2. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assoc. of the United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

    463 U.S. 29 (1983)   Cited 6,630 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that " `settled course of behavior embodies the agency's informed judgment that, by pursuing that course, it will carry out the policies [of applicable statutes or regulations]'"
  3. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

    519 U.S. 337 (1997)   Cited 2,471 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council

    490 U.S. 360 (1989)   Cited 2,001 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts must defer to the "informed discretion" of federal agencies where the agencies’ decisions require "a high level of technical expertise" (quoting Kleppe v. Sierra Club , 427 U.S. 390, 412, 96 S.Ct. 2718, 49 L.Ed.2d 576 (1976) )
  5. Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.

    534 U.S. 438 (2002)   Cited 837 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where Congress has listed some categories of people as to successor liability under 26 U.S.C. § 9706, those not included in the list are not liable because Congress could have included them "clearly and explicitly"
  6. United States v. Rodgers

    466 U.S. 475 (1984)   Cited 212 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a criminal statute was not "absurd" even though, "giv[ing] the statute a ‘literal interpretation’ " resulted in harsher punishment for one who "informally volunteer[ed] an untrue statement to an F.B.I. agent than" for one who "relate[d] the same story under oath before a court of law"
  7. Occidental Engineering Co. v. I.N.S.

    753 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 643 times
    Finding that plaintiff's editing role was not equivalent to a specialty occupation because he did not supervise journalists
  8. Bowen v. American Hospital Assn

    476 U.S. 610 (1986)   Cited 193 times
    Deciding on procedural grounds that HHS lacked authority to promulgate mandatory rules regarding health care for handicapped infants, and declining to decide whether the Rehabilitation Act applies to individual medical treatment decisions involving such infants
  9. S.E.C. v. Joiner Corp.

    320 U.S. 344 (1943)   Cited 533 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that leasehold interests in property adjacent to exploratory oil wells were "securities"
  10. Tourus Records v. D.E.A

    259 F.3d 731 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 210 times
    Holding that, although a court may not accept appellate counsel's post hoc rationalizations for agency actions, it may consider contemporaneous documents outlining the agency's reasoning
  11. Section 841 - Prohibited acts A

    21 U.S.C. § 841   Cited 90,856 times   147 Legal Analyses
    In § 841 prosecutions, then, it is the fact that the doctor issued an unauthorized prescription that renders his or her conduct wrongful, not the fact of the dispensation itself.
  12. Section 922 - Unlawful acts

    18 U.S.C. § 922   Cited 60,332 times   181 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"
  13. Section 101 - Definitions

    11 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 26,716 times   210 Legal Analyses
    Defining "securities clearing agency" by reference to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  14. Section 706 - Scope of review

    5 U.S.C. § 706   Cited 20,437 times   184 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"
  15. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,169 times   556 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party
  16. Section 1001 - Statements or entries generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1001   Cited 7,331 times   300 Legal Analyses
    Making false statements
  17. Section 3729 - False claims

    31 U.S.C. § 3729   Cited 6,732 times   627 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable "any person" who knowingly causes false claims to be presented
  18. Section 552a - Records maintained on individuals

    5 U.S.C. § 552a   Cited 4,427 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Finding that it is a Department of Justice component that has as its principal function the enforcement of criminal laws includ[ing] correctional authorities
  19. Section 9601 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 9601   Cited 4,269 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the definition of “disposal” contained in the Solid Waste Disposal Act
  20. Section 1251 - Congressional declaration of goals and policy

    33 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 3,545 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Designating the Administrator of the EPA to "administer this chapter"
  21. Section 581.3 - Army Board for Correction of Military Records

    32 C.F.R. § 581.3   Cited 138 times
    Providing that an "application may be returned without action if . . . [t]he ABCMR does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief
  22. Section 60.3 - Agencies with authorized personnel

    28 C.F.R. § 60.3   Cited 4 times
    Including the U.S. Postal Inspection Service among the agencies that have law enforcement officers authorized to request search warrants
  23. Section 635.12 - Amendment of records

    32 C.F.R. § 635.12   Cited 1 times

    (a)Policy. An amendment of records is appropriate when such records are established as being inaccurate, irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete. Amendment procedures are not intended to permit challenging an event that actually occurred. Requests to amend reports will be granted only if the individual submits new, relevant and material facts that are determined to warrant their inclusion in or revision of the police report. The burden of proof is on the individual to substantiate the request. Requests