Daimler AG v. Bauman
571 U.S. 117 (2014) Cited 6,085 times 240 Legal AnalysesHolding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction "whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate"
Goodyear Dunlop Tires Oper. v. Brown
564 U.S. 915 (2011) Cited 5,609 times 88 Legal AnalysesHolding "the sales of petitioners' tires sporadically made in North Carolina through intermediaries" insufficient to support general jurisdiction
Zenith Corp. v. Hazeltine
395 U.S. 100 (1969) Cited 2,497 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding that the district court erred when it enjoined a nonparty that was never determined to be in active concert with a defendant
Ruotolo v. City of N.Y
514 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2008) Cited 2,199 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that a party seeking to amend pursuant to a Rule 59 or Rule 60 motion "must first have the judgment vacated or set aside" under those Rules
Peacock v. Thomas
516 U.S. 349 (1996) Cited 777 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Court lacked ancillary jurisdiction to hear claims brought after underlying suit was resolved and where allegations in subsequent suit, which sought to pierce the corporate veil, had "little or no factual interdependence" with underlying question of whether corporate officers had breached their fiduciary duty
Morris v. Dept. of Taxation
82 N.Y.2d 135 (N.Y. 1993) Cited 1,457 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that "piercing the corporate veil requires a showing that: the owners exercised complete domination of the corporation in respect to the transaction attacked; and that such domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff which resulted in plaintiff's injury."
Tamburo v. Dworkin
601 F.3d 693 (7th Cir. 2010) Cited 723 timesHolding that personal jurisdiction existed over a defendant who used "blast emails" to defame the plaintiff business and generate a boycott, noting that some of these messages even listed the plaintiff's address and urged people to harass the plaintiff
Hyatt International Corp. v. Coco
302 F.3d 707 (7th Cir. 2002) Cited 823 timesHolding that defendant could not parse long course of business dealings into "two purportedly unrelated events" in determining that his initial communications and visit with company in Illinois were related to claim that he was owed broker fee for hotel development in Italy
Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.
751 F.3d 796 (7th Cir. 2014) Cited 452 timesHolding that defendant-company's sending emails to Indiana residents as part of email blasts to a larger subscriber list was "entirely fortuitous" because the contacts with Indiana depended on "the users who signed up," i.e., activities "wholly ... out of the defendant's control"
Wm. Passalacqua Builders v. Resnick Developers
933 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1991) Cited 658 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that attachment suits are actions at law for Seventh Amendment purposes because they primarily seek money damages
Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 Cited 35,685 times 55 Legal AnalysesAdopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)
Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification
15 U.S.C. § 1051 Cited 3,907 times 126 Legal AnalysesRequiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark
Section 504 - Consideration and payment for shares
N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 504 Cited 44 times(a) Consideration for the issue of shares shall consist of money or other property, tangible or intangible; labor or services actually received by or performed for the corporation or for its benefit or in its formation or reorganization; a binding obligation to pay the purchase price or the subscription price in cash or other property; a binding obligation to perform services having an agreed value; or a combination thereof. In the absence of fraud in the transaction, the judgment of the board or