32 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 253,044 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,860 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  3. Pennhurst State School Hosp. v. Halderman

    465 U.S. 89 (1984)   Cited 13,457 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sovereign immunity prohibits federal courts from "instruct[ing] state officials on how to conform their conduct to state law"
  4. Warth v. Seldin

    422 U.S. 490 (1975)   Cited 11,875 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"
  5. Ex Parte Young

    209 U.S. 123 (1908)   Cited 10,822 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts may enjoin state officials to conform their conduct to federal law
  6. Reno v. Condon

    528 U.S. 141 (2000)   Cited 234 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal statute did not commandeer state officials where it neither required state legislatures to enact laws or regulations nor required state officials to assist in the enforcement of federal statutes
  7. Pichler v. Unite

    542 F.3d 380 (3d Cir. 2008)   Cited 192 times
    Holding that issue of "willfulness or recklessness of a defendant's conduct" under a different federal statute required trial by jury
  8. Clark v. Boscher

    514 F.3d 107 (1st Cir. 2008)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that city officials' alleged pattern of arbitrary and unreasonable denials of the plaintiff's new land development plan failed to satisfy the "shocks the conscience" standard
  9. U.S. Duxbury v. Ortho Biotech Pro

    579 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2009)   Cited 155 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in actions “in which the defendant induced third parties to file false claims with the government,” it was not necessary to “provid[e] details as to each false claim” if there were “factual or statistical evidence to strengthen the inference of fraud beyond possibility”
  10. McCready v. White

    417 F.3d 700 (7th Cir. 2005)   Cited 169 times
    Holding that " authorizes private suits, but only by persons whose information has been disclosed improperly"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 346,241 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 30A:14 - Judicial review

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 30A § 14   Cited 1,124 times
    Granting the court the authority to remand, set aside, or modify an agency's decision "if it determines that the substantial rights of any party may have been prejudiced because the agency decision is . . . [b]ased upon an error of law"
  13. Section 2721 - Prohibition on release and use of certain personal information from State motor vehicle records

    18 U.S.C. § 2721   Cited 611 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Exempting any government agency, including law enforcement, "in carrying out its functions"
  14. Section 2724 - Civil action

    18 U.S.C. § 2724   Cited 288 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Outlining remedies available under the DPPA
  15. Section 214:1B - Right of privacy

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 214 § 1B   Cited 195 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Creating statutory right to privacy
  16. Section 4:7 - Definitions of statutory terms; statutory construction

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 4 § 7   Cited 160 times
    Defining "public records"
  17. Section 66:10 - Inspection and copies of public records; extension of time; fees

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 66 § 10   Cited 122 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that only part of state records may be public