528 U.S. 141 (2000) Cited 234 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a federal statute did not commandeer state officials where it neither required state legislatures to enact laws or regulations nor required state officials to assist in the enforcement of federal statutes
Holding that city officials' alleged pattern of arbitrary and unreasonable denials of the plaintiff's new land development plan failed to satisfy the "shocks the conscience" standard
Holding that, in actions “in which the defendant induced third parties to file false claims with the government,” it was not necessary to “provid[e] details as to each false claim” if there were “factual or statistical evidence to strengthen the inference of fraud beyond possibility”
Granting the court the authority to remand, set aside, or modify an agency's decision "if it determines that the substantial rights of any party may have been prejudiced because the agency decision is . . . [b]ased upon an error of law"