§Why CasetextPricing

City of Monroe Employees' Retirement System v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 24 MOTION to Appoint Arca S.G.R. S.p.A. to serve as lead plaintiff

7 Cited authorities

  1. Kaplan v. Gelfond

    240 F.R.D. 88 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)   Cited 158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff must be attorney in-fact and have ultimate decision-making power over managed funds to establish standing

  2. In re Oxford Health Plans, Inc. Securities Litigation

    182 F.R.D. 42 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)   Cited 168 times
    Finding that diversity among plaintiffs helps ensure that all class members' interests are represented

  3. Sofran v. LaBranche & Co., Inc.

    220 F.R.D. 398 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)   Cited 31 times
    Rejecting the argument that because the proposed lead plaintiff was not the beneficial owner of the shares that it could not serve as an adequate lead plaintiff

  4. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,129 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  5. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 35,573 times   1241 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"

  6. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,592 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party

  7. Section 78u - Investigations and actions

    15 U.S.C. § 78u   Cited 2,326 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Granting the SEC the power to seek civil penalties for violations of the Exchange Act