19 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 237,112 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Forsyth v. Barr
19 F.3d 1527 (5th Cir. 1994) Cited 2,766 times
Holding that plaintiffs, asserting violations of § 2511, had not produced "evidence sufficient to demonstrate the existence of a material fact issue on whether the appellees intentionally intercepted their conversations"
East Ford v. Taylor
2000 IA 1527 (Miss. 2002) Cited 197 times
Finding it unnecessary to address substantive unconscionability where a plaintiff had demonstrated that an arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable
St. Amant v. Benoit
806 F.2d 1294 (5th Cir. 1987) Cited 303 times
Holding § 1983 claim accrued on the date plaintiff was notified that his transfer request was denied
Russell v. Performance Toyota
2001 CA 832 (Miss. 2002) Cited 159 times
Holding an arbitration clause in an automobile purchase agreement to be neither procedurally nor substantially unconscionable and distinguishing Taylor
Young v. Fordice
520 U.S. 273 (1997) Cited 38 times
In Young v. Fordice, 520 U.S. 273, 117 S.Ct. 1228, 137 L.Ed.2d 448 (1997), our most recent case deciding whether a voting practice was a baseline under § 5, we concluded that the registration procedure at issue was not “in force or effect” and therefore could not serve as the § 5 baseline.
McCain v. Lybrand
465 U.S. 236 (1984) Cited 55 times
Interpreting Act "in light of its prophylactic purpose and the historical experience which it reflects"
Pleasant Grove v. United States
479 U.S. 462 (1987) Cited 36 times
Concluding that Pleasant Grove engaged in purposeful discrimination to minimize future Black voting strength
Newell v. Oxford Management, Inc.
912 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1990) Cited 101 times
No. 90-3017. Summary Calendar. September 21, 1990. Louis R. Koerner, Jr., New Orleans, La., for appellants. Robert P. Roberts, New Orleans, La., for appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Before KING, GARWOOD, and DUHE, Circuit Judges. DUHE, Circuit Judge. The record discloses the following undisputed facts necessary to resolve this matter: Northlake Federal Savings Loan Association ("Northlake") agreed to lend L B Jackson's Landing, a Louisiana
Pridgen v. Green Tree Financial Servicing Corp.
88 F. Supp. 2d 655 (S.D. Miss. 2000) Cited 67 times
Holding that arbitration clause allowing only one party to submit claims to arbitration at its choosing was not substantively unconscionable under Mississippi law
Section 1973 - Transferred
42 U.S.C. § 1973 Cited 1,593 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that no change in voting takes effect until precleared
Section 1973c - Transferred
42 U.S.C. § 1973c Cited 894 times 1 Legal Analyses
Setting forth the requirements of § 5
Section 1971 - Transferred
42 U.S.C. § 1971 Cited 594 times
Granting jurisdiction to the United States District Courts
Section 21-1-59 - Municipalities may not incorporate state institutions without consent; effect of annexation crossing county lines on schools in annexed areas; annexations prior to March 18, 1987 ratified; municipalities authorized to enter agreements with enterprises operating certain projects provided that such municipalities not change boundaries to include project site
Miss. Code § 21-1-59 Cited 6 times
(1) No municipality shall be created or shall change its boundaries so as to include within the limits of such municipality any of the buildings or grounds of any state institution, unless consent thereto shall be obtained in writing from the board of trustees of such institution or such other governing board or body as may be created for the control of such institution. Inclusion of the buildings or grounds of any state institution within the area of a municipal incorporation or expansion without

City of Canton, Mississippi et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.

19 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that plaintiffs, asserting violations of § 2511, had not produced "evidence sufficient to demonstrate the existence of a material fact issue on whether the appellees intentionally intercepted their conversations"

Finding it unnecessary to address substantive unconscionability where a plaintiff had demonstrated that an arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable

Holding § 1983 claim accrued on the date plaintiff was notified that his transfer request was denied

Holding an arbitration clause in an automobile purchase agreement to be neither procedurally nor substantially unconscionable and distinguishing Taylor

In Young v. Fordice, 520 U.S. 273, 117 S.Ct. 1228, 137 L.Ed.2d 448 (1997), our most recent case deciding whether a voting practice was a baseline under § 5, we concluded that the registration procedure at issue was not “in force or effect” and therefore could not serve as the § 5 baseline.

Interpreting Act "in light of its prophylactic purpose and the historical experience which it reflects"

Concluding that Pleasant Grove engaged in purposeful discrimination to minimize future Black voting strength

Holding that arbitration clause allowing only one party to submit claims to arbitration at its choosing was not substantively unconscionable under Mississippi law

Holding that no change in voting takes effect until precleared

Setting forth the requirements of § 5

Granting jurisdiction to the United States District Courts