43 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,626 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Mine Workers v. Gibbs

    383 U.S. 715 (1966)   Cited 17,783 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that supplemental jurisdiction is a "doctrine of discretion"
  3. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.

    561 U.S. 247 (2010)   Cited 1,458 times   177 Legal Analyses
    Holding extraterritorial application of a statute is a merits question, not a question of subject matter jurisdiction
  4. Boyle v. United States

    556 U.S. 938 (2009)   Cited 1,134 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a RICO enterprise "need not have a hierarchical structure or a 'chain of command'; decisions may be made on an ad hoc basis and by any number of methods — by majority vote, consensus, a show of strength, etc."
  5. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corp.

    503 U.S. 258 (1992)   Cited 1,665 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) could not recover under RICO for stock-manipulation scheme that bankrupted broker-dealers, triggering a statutory requirement that SIPC meet the broker-dealers' obligations to their customers
  6. Hemi Group, LLC v. City of New York

    559 U.S. 1 (2010)   Cited 762 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant retailer's failure to make state-law-required disclosures that would make it easier for the City to recover delinquent taxes did not proximately cause the City's injury, which more directly came from the delinquent taxpayers themselves
  7. Rotella v. Wood

    528 U.S. 549 (2000)   Cited 919 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding discovery rule inapplicable to § 2462 limitations period
  8. Dole Food Co. v. Watts

    303 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,066 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because purposeful direction was established, it was "obvious" that the second prong of the minimum contacts test was also satisfied
  9. Greenwood v. F.A.A

    28 F.3d 971 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 1,018 times
    Holding that an argument not "specifically and distinctly" argued in the appellant's opening brief was waived
  10. Eclectic Properties East, LLC v. Marcus & Millichap Co.

    751 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 450 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations are not plausible unless plaintiffs allege "facts tending to exclude the possibility that the [defendant's] explanation is true."
  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,918 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"
  12. Section 1341 - Frauds and swindles

    18 U.S.C. § 1341   Cited 13,401 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Relating to mail fraud
  13. Section 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments

    18 U.S.C. § 1956   Cited 9,287 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Defining “specified unlawful activity” to include, inter alia, controlled substance violations, murder, bribery, smuggling, various forms of fraud, concealment of assets, various environmental offenses, and health care offenses
  14. Section 1957 - Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity

    18 U.S.C. § 1957   Cited 3,260 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Finding an error in the trial court's jury instructions harmless "[b]ecause overwhelming evidence support[ed] the jury's finding" of guilt
  15. Section 2314 - Transportation of stolen goods, securities, moneys, fraudulent State tax stamps, or articles used in counterfeiting

    18 U.S.C. § 2314   Cited 3,063 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing the transportation, transmission, or transfer of goods "in interstate or foreign commerce"
  16. Section 17208 - Statute of limitations

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17208   Cited 630 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Governing UCL claims