§Why CasetextPricing

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Arista Networks, Inc.

MOTION for Mandatory Stay of Proceedings

3 Cited authorities

  1. In re Princo Corp.

    478 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that a party whose right "cannot be vindicated by direct appeal" "lacks adequate alternative means to obtain the relief sought"

  2. Formfactor, Inc. v. Micronics Japan Co.

    No. CV-06-07159 JSW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)   Cited 3 times

    No. CV-06-07159 JSW. February 11, 2008 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY JEFFREY WHITE, District Judge Now before the Court is the motion of Defendants Micronics Japan Co. Ltd. and MJC Electronics Corp. (collectively "Micronics") to stay this action. Having carefully reviewed the parties' papers and considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Micronics' motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff FormFactor Inc. ("FormFactor") filed a complaint against

  3. Section 1659 - Stay of certain actions pending disposition of related proceedings before the United States International Trade Commission

    28 U.S.C. § 1659   Cited 121 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Distinguishing between civil actions and proceedings before the International Trade Commission, and permitting stay of civil action in favor of overlapping ITC proceedings in certain circumstances