16 Cited authorities

  1. Mcconnell v. F.E.C.

    540 U.S. 93 (2003)   Cited 603 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding BCRA survived exacting scrutiny, given the “important state interests” in “providing the electorate with information, deterring actual corruption and avoiding any appearance thereof, and gathering the data necessary to enforce more substantive electioneering restrictions”
  2. Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc.

    479 U.S. 238 (1986)   Cited 315 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an organization that "only occasionally engage[d] in independent spending on behalf of candidates" could not be subjected to PAC-style disclosure requirements
  3. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce

    494 U.S. 652 (1990)   Cited 254 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a segregated-fund requirement that did not explicitly carve out an MCFL exception could apply to a non-profit corporation that did not qualify for MCFL status
  4. Federal Election Commission v. Beaumont

    539 U.S. 146 (2003)   Cited 124 times
    Holding that restrictions on the activity of contributing to a candidate's campaign are “merely ‘marginal’ speech restrictions subject to relatively complaisant review”
  5. Cityfed Fin. v. Office of Thrift Supervision

    58 F.3d 738 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that a moving party's failure to make a showing of irreparable injury "alone is sufficient" to deny a motion for a preliminary injunction
  6. Federal Election Commission v. National Right to Work Committee

    459 U.S. 197 (1982)   Cited 141 times
    Upholding restriction limiting a corporation's solicitation of contributions to corporation's PAC to members of the corporation on the basis of compelling governmental interests supporting the overall ban on corporate contributions to candidates
  7. Cobell v. Norton

    391 F.3d 251 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that a district court abuses its discretion when it fails to hold an evidentiary hearing where credibility determinations are required
  8. Serono Laboratories v. Shalala

    158 F.3d 1313 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 247 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding deference “is owed to the decisionmaker authorized to speak on behalf of the agency, not to each individual agency employee”
  9. Burroughs and Cannon v. U.S.

    290 U.S. 534 (1934)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that the Federal Corrupt Practices Act of 1925, which limited expenditures by candidates and prohibited contributions by corporations was within the power of Congress and not reserved to the states by Art. II, § 1 of the U.S. Constitution
  10. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,340 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice
  11. Section 431 - Transferred

    2 U.S.C. § 431   Cited 470 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Exempting news stories, commentaries, and editorials from FECA's definition of "expenditure"
  12. Section 441b - Transferred

    2 U.S.C. § 441b   Cited 221 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Stating that "[i]t is unlawful for . . . any labor organization to make a contribution or expenditure in connection with any election at which presidential and vice presidential electors or a Senator or Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, Congress are to be voted for, . . . or any labor organization to consent to any contribution or expenditure by the . . . labor organization . . . prohibited by this section."
  13. Section 441a - Transferred

    2 U.S.C. § 441a   Cited 217 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Permitting national or state political committees to make unlimited “transfers” to other committees “of the same political party”
  14. Section 434 - Transferred

    2 U.S.C. § 434   Cited 193 times
    Requiring disclosure of "contributions ... expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate"
  15. Section 527 - Political organizations

    26 U.S.C. § 527   Cited 71 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Subjecting 501(c) organizations to income tax for campaign activities
  16. Section 56.4911-2 - Lobbying expenditures, direct lobbying communications, and grass roots lobbying communications

    26 C.F.R. § 56.4911-2   Cited 1 times

    (a)Lobbying expenditures - (1)In general. An electing public charity's lobbying expenditures for a year are the sum of its expenditures during that year for direct lobbying communications ("direct lobbying expenditures") plus its expenditures during that year for grass roots lobbying communications ("grass roots expenditures"). (2)Overview of § 56.4911-2 and the definitions of "direct lobbying communication" and "grass roots lobbying communication". Paragraph (b)(1) of this section defines the term