Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Lewis v. Casey

Holding that a prisoner must show an actual injury to state a claim for denial of access to courts

Allen v. Wright

Holding that, even when plaintiffs allege "one of the most serious injuries recognized in our legal system," it's not justiciable where "the chain of causation between the challenged Government conduct and the asserted injury are far too weak for the chain as a whole to sustain respondents' standing"

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hague

Holding that a Minnesota court may apply Minnesota rule permitting “stacking” of motorcycle insurance policies because plaintiff now lived in Minnesota and her deceased spouse had worked in Minnesota, even though plaintiff had lived in Wisconsin at the time of the accident, and even though decedent had lived in Wisconsin, had taken out the insurance policies in Wisconsin, and had been killed in Wisconsin

Blue Cross v. Philip Morris

Holding "that a third-party payer has no standing to bring an action under [GBL section] 349 because its claims are too remote" and "that what is required [under section 349] is that the party actually injured be the one to bring suit"

In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation

Holding that subpoenas served on defendants and grand jury investigation carry no weight in pleading antitrust conspiracy where it is unknown whether investigation will result in indictments or nothing at all, also noting that a decision not to prosecute would not be binding on plaintiffs, and granting leave to amend

In re Actions

Holding “that the term ‘reverse payment’ is not limited to a cash payment”

In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litig.

Holding that "a purchaser suing a monopolist for overcharges is injured anew by each overcharge"

In re Flash Memory Antitrust Litigation

Holding that to withstand dismissal, it was not necessary for plaintiffs to "identify who attended these meetings, what was discussed at them, or how they purportedly related to the conspiracy other than providing an opportunity for the parties to talk to one another"

In re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram) Antitrust Litigation

Holding that Kansas courts "would support application of the AGC test in assessing antitrust standing"

Section 75-1.1 - Methods of competition, acts and practices regulated; legislative policy

Declaring unlawful "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce"

Section 2072 - Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe

Granting the Supreme Court, not the parties, authority to "prescribe general rules of practice and procedure" for federal district court cases

Section 93A:11 - Persons engaged in business; actions for unfair trade practices; class actions; damages; injunction; costs

Requiring proof of willful conduct as a predicate to trebling

Section 93A:1 - Definitions

Defining "trade" and "commerce"

Section 59-1601 - Terms, defined

Section 57-12-3 - Unfair or deceptive and unconscionable trade practices prohibited

Section 740 ILCS 10/7

Stating that only the Illinois state attorney general may bring a class action on behalf of indirect purchasers under Illinois law

Section 6-13.1-1 - Definitions

Defining "unfair trade practices" as those "[c]ausing likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding"

Section 6-13.1-5.2 - Private and class actions

Providing a remedy only to "[a]ny person who purchases or leases goods or services primarily for personal, family, or household purposes"

Section 30-14-133 - Damages - limitation on residential construction disputes - notice to public agencies - attorney fees - prior judgment as evidence

Permitting "a consumer who suffers any ascertainable loss of money or property, real or personal, as a result of" a violation of Montana's Consumer Protection Act to recover damages