50 Cited authorities

Tellabs v. Makor Issues Rights
551 U.S. 308 (2007) Cited 9,087 times 104 Legal Analyses
Holding that a strong inference is one that is "cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference"
Lewis v. Casey
518 U.S. 343 (1996) Cited 14,250 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a prisoner must show an actual injury to state a claim for denial of access to courts
Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor
521 U.S. 591 (1997) Cited 6,940 times 69 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts are "bound to enforce" Rule 23's certification requirements, even where it means decertifying a class after they had reached a settlement agreement and submitted it to the court for approval
Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
552 U.S. 148 (2008) Cited 1,181 times 80 Legal Analyses
Holding that the fraud-on-the-market presumption did not apply because business partners' "deceptive acts were not communicated to the public"
Central Bank of Denver v. First I.S. Bk. of Denver
511 U.S. 164 (1994) Cited 1,690 times 79 Legal Analyses
Holding that Section 10(b)’s private right of action does not include suits against aiders and abettors
Merck Co. v. Reynolds
559 U.S. 633 (2010) Cited 661 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that because no event preceding the critical date constituted "discovery" of facts necessary to bring the complaint, the plaintiffs' suit was timely
Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.
527 U.S. 815 (1999) Cited 930 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that "a fairness hearing under Rule 23(e) is no substitute for rigorous adherence to those provisions of the Rule designed to protect absentees"
Merrill v. Dabit
547 U.S. 71 (2006) Cited 668 times 43 Legal Analyses
Holding that state law class action securities fraud claims brought by “holders” of securities are, just like those of “purchasers” and “sellers,” preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act
Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
421 U.S. 723 (1975) Cited 2,070 times 26 Legal Analyses
Holding that only purchasers and sellers of a security have a private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b–5
Novak v. Kasaks
216 F.3d 300 (2d Cir. 2000) Cited 1,596 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding section 78u-4(b) does not literally require pleading of all facts, so long as facts pleaded provide adequate basis for believing statements were false
Section 78j - Manipulative and deceptive devices
15 U.S.C. § 78j Cited 12,493 times 165 Legal Analyses
Granting SEC power to establish rules to further statute forbidding manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with purchase or sale of securities
Section 1658 - Time limitations on the commencement of civil actions arising under Acts of Congress
28 U.S.C. § 1658 Cited 2,372 times 41 Legal Analyses
Holding that the state-law tort period controls § 1983 actions

Chilton et al v. Smith Barney Fund Management LLC et al

50 Cited authorities

Holding that a strong inference is one that is "cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference"

Holding that a prisoner must show an actual injury to state a claim for denial of access to courts

Holding that courts are "bound to enforce" Rule 23's certification requirements, even where it means decertifying a class after they had reached a settlement agreement and submitted it to the court for approval

Holding that the fraud-on-the-market presumption did not apply because business partners' "deceptive acts were not communicated to the public"

Holding that Section 10(b)’s private right of action does not include suits against aiders and abettors

Holding that because no event preceding the critical date constituted "discovery" of facts necessary to bring the complaint, the plaintiffs' suit was timely

Holding that "a fairness hearing under Rule 23(e) is no substitute for rigorous adherence to those provisions of the Rule designed to protect absentees"

Holding that state law class action securities fraud claims brought by “holders” of securities are, just like those of “purchasers” and “sellers,” preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act

Holding that only purchasers and sellers of a security have a private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b–5

Holding section 78u-4(b) does not literally require pleading of all facts, so long as facts pleaded provide adequate basis for believing statements were false

Granting SEC power to establish rules to further statute forbidding manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with purchase or sale of securities

Holding that the state-law tort period controls § 1983 actions