5 Cited authorities

  1. Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading (Ireland), Ltd. v. Coventry First LLC

    280 F.R.D. 147 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)   Cited 168 times
    Concluding that preclusion was not appropriate where the court could grant a continuance by allowing additional discovery and shifting some of the costs to the noncompliant party
  2. Behler v. Hanlon

    199 F.R.D. 553 (D. Md. 2001)   Cited 77 times
    Finding that, for purposes of impeachment, expert witness had to provide certain financial and other work-related history information through discovery
  3. Jones v. Young

    No. 3:04CV00257 JLH (E.D. Ark. Sep. 10, 2007)   Cited 3 times
    Finding amended complaint identifying defendant relates back to John Doe pleading when Arkansas statute of limitations applied and plaintiff used Ark. Code Ann. § 16-56-125
  4. Beckner v. Cropscience

    Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-00530 (S.D.W. Va. Jun. 28, 2006)   Cited 3 times

    Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-00530. June 28, 2006 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARY STANLEY, Magistrate Judge On May 24, 2006, Plaintiff Roger D. Beckner by counsel served a subpoena duces tecum upon West Virginia University Foundation, Inc. seeking production of certain donation records. West Virginia University Foundation, Inc. ("the Foundation") filed a Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum, and Plaintiff filed a Response. (Docket # 109, 118.) Thereafter, the Foundation

  5. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,110 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems