REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 483 MOTION for Summary Judgment. CHEVRON CORPORATION'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON STRATUS DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL. Document
Finding falsity where facts established that "no reasonable interpretation of the question" could lead the insured to conclude that it answer provided was complete and truthful
Holding that an affirmative defense may be stricken “when review of the record in a light most favorable to the defendant reveals the absence of evidence supporting an essential element of the defense.”
Holding that district court erred in dismissing claim without prejudice, rather than with prejudice, where claim was withdrawn by the plaintiff at close of trial due to lack of evidence
Finding district court abused its discretion in granting plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal where the court "failed to consider the Zagano factors in assessing whether the case had proceeded so far along that the defendant could be prejudiced"
Holding that a complainant should be granted the right to dismiss a claim unless it would “prejudice the defendants in some other way than by the mere prospect of being harassed and vexed by future litigation of the same kind ”
Holding reduction-in-force termination of 49–year old manager whose salary was higher than retained younger worker who took over discharged manager's job responsibilities did not constitute employment discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Holding that under Illinois law, a plaintiff may be both direct victim and bystander in the same incident for purposes of determining the source of his emotional distress
Holding a declaratory judgment action remained live where the defendants had neither dismissed with prejudice their arbitration claims against the plaintiff nor filed an amended complaint to eliminate the disputed claims