8 Cited authorities

Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.
206 F.R.D. 78 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) Cited 258 times
Holding that a party whose banking records are subpoenaed has standing to oppose the subpoena
Collens v. City of N.Y.
222 F.R.D. 249 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) Cited 84 times
Finding that having the officer swear to an affidavit declaring her net worth was a more efficient and less intrusive means for obtaining financial discovery
DEY, L.P. v. SEPRACOR, INC.
07 Civ. 2353 (JGK) (RLE) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2010) Cited 13 times
07 Civ. 2353 (JGK) (RLE). December 8, 2010 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RONALD ELLIS, Magistrate Judge I. Introduction On July 19, 2010, Plaintiffs Dey L.P., Dey Inc. and Mylan Inc. (collectively, "Dey") served a privilege log on Defendant Sepracor Inc. ("Sepracor") containing 170 entries. Sepracor contends that Dey's assertion of privilege was not timely because it was raised two years after Dey decided to withhold the documents, and requests the Court order Dey to produce the documents. Dey argues
Oxaal v. Internet Pictures Corporation
No. 00-CV-1863 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2002) Cited 5 times
No. 00-CV-1863 (LEK/DRH) March 27, 2002 GIRVIN FERLAZZO, P.C., Albany, New York, OF COUNSEL: DANIEL M. SLEASMAN, ESQ., Attorney for Plaintiff Oxaal. DeGRAFF, FOY, HOLT-HARRIS KUNZ, LLP, Albany, New York, OF COUNSEL: CHRISTOPHER MASSARONI, ESQ., Attorney for Defendant Internet. BANNER WITCOFF, LTD., Washington, D.C., OF COUNSEL: ROBERT F. ALTHERR, ESQ., THOMAS H. JACKSON, ESQ., CHRISTOPHER L. McKEE, ESQ., Attorney for Defendant Internet. MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER DAVID R. HOMER, United States
Section 636 - Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment
28 U.S.C. § 636 Cited 499,657 times 39 Legal Analyses
Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"
Rule 72 - Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 Cited 166,222 times 20 Legal Analyses
Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order
Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 Cited 33,646 times 51 Legal Analyses
Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)
Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose
Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 Cited 15,003 times 47 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"

Chevron Corporation v. Donziger et al

8 Cited authorities

Holding that a party whose banking records are subpoenaed has standing to oppose the subpoena

Finding that having the officer swear to an affidavit declaring her net worth was a more efficient and less intrusive means for obtaining financial discovery

Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"

Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order

Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)

Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"