Medina-Munoz v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Holding that one opposing summary judgment cannot rely simply on "conclusory allegations" or "unsupported speculation"

Mack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Holding that a party may not "undertake wholly exploratory operations in the vague hope that something helpful will turn up."

Psy-Ed Corp. v. Klein

Concluding that "economic coercion" did not amount to actual malice

Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment Security

Holding that arguments not raised before an agency are waived for purposes of administrative review

Matamoros v. Starbucks Corp

Holding that a class was not “unascertainable and overbroad” where it was defined in terms of an “objective criterion”

Others v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l, Inc.

Holding that "the lack of a contract between the parties does not itself, without more, preclude liability under the independent contractor statute"

Crocker v. Townsend Oil Co.

Holding that under the discovery rule, the statute of limitations runs from the time a plaintiff discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the underlying harm for which relief is sought

Vázquez Laboy v. Doral Mortgage Corp.

Ruling that for judgment to be final, the issue of monetary liability must be resolved

Mass. Delivery Ass'n v. Coakley

Holding that the "peril of an enforcement" of an existing statute was not "remote or speculative" because the plaintiffs had been sued by private parties for violation of the statute

Sebago v. Bos. Cab Dispatch, Inc.

Holding that taxicab drivers were not employees of the cab owners, radio associations, and taxicab garage in part because they were free to work as much or as little as they wanted for different cab and medallion owners each day

Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Section 149:148B - Persons performing service not authorized under this chapter deemed employees; exception

Specifying types of services considered to be not those performed by an employee and noting that an employer's failure to make withholdings or payments that would be required for an employee "shall not be considered in making a determination" as to a person's employee status

Section 149:152A - Payment to, or retention by, employer of tips to employees; contract for payment

Defining a "[t]ip" as "a sum of money, including any amount designated by a credit card patron, a gift or a gratuity, given as an acknowledgment of any service performed by a wait staff employee, service employee, or service bartender"

Section 3 CCR 714-1-F-9