44 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 53,320 times   96 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
  2. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

    25 Cal.4th 826 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 4,980 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the gathering and dissemination of pricing information by the petroleum companies through an independent industry service did not imply collusive action where there was no evidence the information was misused as a basis for an unlawful conspiracy; rather, evidence suggested that individual companies used all available resources “to determine capacity, supply, and pricing decisions which would maximize their own individual profits”
  3. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 317 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 3,317 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an implied covenant "cannot be endowed with an existence independent of its contractual underpinnings. It cannot impose substantive duties or limits on the contracting parties beyond those incorporated in the specific terms of their agreement."
  4. Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA Inc.

    36 Cal.4th 1028 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 1,581 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to establish a "protected activity," an "employee's communications to the employer [must] sufficiently convey the employee's reasonable concerns that the employer has acted or is acting in an unlawful discriminatory manner."
  5. Miller v. Department of Corrections

    36 Cal.4th 446 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 578 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there was a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiffs could maintain a hostile work environment claim on the ground that widespread favoritism created an atmosphere demeaning to women, where a prison warden was engaged in sexual relationships with three female employees with whom he frequently engaged in public displays of sexual conduct; and who, because of their relationship with the warden, were granted employment benefits not available to others; permitted to harass the employees without repercussions; and provided advancement opportunities based upon sexual favors rather than merit
  6. Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

    7 Cal.4th 1238 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 687 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff's "claim of whistle-blower harassment fails because he cannot demonstrate the required nexus between his reporting of alleged statutory violations and his allegedly adverse treatment"
  7. Serri v. Santa Clara University

    226 Cal.App.4th 830 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 342 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming summary adjudication of harassment claims due to lack of "hostile or derogatory statements"
  8. White v. Ultramar, Inc.

    21 Cal.4th 563 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 474 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a single act of retaliatory termination demonstrated that a middle manager "determined corporate policy"
  9. Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.

    63 Cal.App.4th 280 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 485 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statutory language of § 12940 does not "support recovery on . . . a private right of action where there has been a specific factual finding that [the alleged] discrimination or harassment actually occurred at the plaintiffs's workplace"
  10. Hersant v. Department of Social Services

    57 Cal.App.4th 997 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 492 times
    Holding that "to avoid summary judgment, an employee claiming discrimination must offer substantial evidence that the employer's stated nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse action was untrue or pretextual, or evidence the employer acted with a discriminatory animus, or a combination of the two, such that a reasonable trier of fact could conclude the employer engaged in intentional discrimination.
  11. Section 437c - [Effective Until 1/1/2025] Motion for summary judgment

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c   Cited 8,420 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Ruling on summary judgment motion must be based on "papers submitted" with the motion
  12. Section 3294 - When damages recoverable for sake of example and by way of punishment; employer liability for acts of employee; death from homicide

    Cal. Civ. Code § 3294   Cited 2,869 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Stating plaintiff may recover punitive damages "in addition to the actual damages"
  13. Section 12900 - Short title

    Cal. Gov. Code § 12900   Cited 2,320 times   9 Legal Analyses

    This part may be known and referred to as the "California Fair Employment and Housing Act." Ca. Gov. Code § 12900 Amended by Stats 2022 ch 48 (SB 189),s 29, eff. 6/30/2022(amended Part heading). Added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 992.

  14. Section 1102.5 - Whistleblower protection

    Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5   Cited 1,286 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Making it unlawful for an employer to impose any policy which "prevent an employee from disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency ... or to another employee who has authority to investigate, discover, or correct the violation or noncompliance"
  15. Section 12940 - [Effective Until 1/1/2025] Unlawful employment practices

    Cal. Gov. Code § 12940   Cited 1,045 times
    Prohibiting discrimination because of "sex, ... sexual orientation," etc.
  16. Section 1630.2 - Definitions

    29 C.F.R. § 1630.2   Cited 8,531 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding that major life activity is substantially limited if plaintiff is "significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities"
  17. Section 11068 - Reasonable Accommodation

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11068   Cited 83 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting or extending a leave may be a reasonable accommodation "provided that the leave is likely to be effective in allowing the employee to return to work at the end of the leave ...."
  18. Section 11065 - Definitions

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11065   Cited 71 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Defining essential and marginal functions
  19. Section 11069 - Interactive Process

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11069   Cited 29 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Requiring employer to explore alternative accommodations after a denial
  20. Section 11023 - Harassment and Discrimination Prevention and Correction

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11023   Cited 12 times   4 Legal Analyses

    (a) Employers have an affirmative duty to take reasonable steps to prevent and promptly correct discriminatory and harassing conduct. (Gov. Code, § 12940(k).) (1) A determination as to whether an employer has complied with Government Code section 12940(k) includes an individualized assessment, depending upon numerous factors sometimes unique to the particular employer including, but not limited to, its workforce size, budget, and nature of its business, as well as upon the facts of a particular case

  21. Section 11067 - Defenses

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11067   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) In addition to any other defense provided in these disability regulations, any defense permissible under Article 1 of Subchapter 2, at California Code of Regulations, title 2, section 11010, shall be applicable to this article. (b) Health or Safety of an Individual with a Disability. It is a permissible defense for an employer or other covered entity to demonstrate that, after engaging in the interactive process, there is no reasonable accommodation that would allow the applicant or employee

  22. Section 11017 - Employee Selection

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11017

    (a) Selection and Testing. Any policy or practice of an employer or other covered entity that has an adverse impact on employment opportunities of individuals on a basis enumerated in the Act is unlawful unless the policy or practice is job-related and consistent with business necessity (business necessity is defined in section 11010(b)). The Council herein adopts the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures promulgated by various federal agencies, including the EEOC and Department of