§Why CasetextPricing

city and county of san franciscos opposition to petitioners motion for

undefined

13 Cited authorities

  1. Allen v. City of Sacramento

    234 Cal.App.4th 41 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 429 times
    Holding allegation of "a wrongful arrest or detention, without more, does not" state a claim for violation of the Bane Act

  2. Tobe v. City of Santa Ana

    9 Cal.4th 1069 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 460 times
    Holding that the terms camping, living, and store are not "vague ... when the purpose clause of the ordinance is considered and the terms are read in that context as they should be."

  3. Martin v. City of Boise

    920 F.3d 584 (9th Cir. 2019)   Cited 129 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[S]o long as there is a greater number of homeless individuals in a jurisdiction than the number of available beds in shelters, the jurisdiction cannot prosecute homeless individuals for involuntarily sitting, lying, and sleeping in public."

  4. Cohen v. Board of Supervisors

    40 Cal.3d 277 (Cal. 1985)   Cited 198 times
    In Cohen v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 40 Cal.3d 277, 286-287, our high court stated: “Generally, the ruling on an application for a preliminary injunction rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.

  5. Triple a Machine Shop, Inc v. State of California

    213 Cal.App.3d 131 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 46 times
    Reversing preliminary injunction barring prosecutors from contacting certain corporate employees during criminal investigation

  6. Tahoe Keys Property Owners' Assn. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.

    23 Cal.App.4th 1459 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 38 times
    In Tahoe Keys Property Owners' Assn. v. State Water Resources Control Bd. (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1459, 1472, the court weighed defendants' public interest activities against evidence that any harm could readily be redressed by compensatory damages and held that a preliminary injunction was therefore not appropriate.

  7. Aitken v. City of Aberdeen

    393 F. Supp. 3d 1075 (W.D. Wash. 2019)   Cited 7 times

    CASE NO. 3:19-cv-05322-RBL 07-02-2019 Elizabeth AITKEN, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ABERDEEN, a municipal government, Defendant. James E. Lobsenz, Carney Badley Spellman PS, Todd Maybrown, Allen Hansen Maybrown & Offenbecher, PS, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey S. Myers, John E. Justice, Law Lyman Daniel Kamerrer & Bogdanovich, Olympia, WA, Mary Patrice Kent, City of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, WA, for Defendant. Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge James E. Lobsenz, Carney Badley Spellman

  8. City of Vernon v. Central Basin Mun. Water Dist.

    69 Cal.App.4th 508 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 24 times
    In City of Vernon v. Central Basin Mun. WaterDist. (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 508 [ 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 650] (City of Vernon), the lone prior published case to address the provision, a member of the board of directors of a municipal water district participated in setting the uniform rates at which the district would sell reclaimed water to wholesalers.

  9. Frank v. City of St. Louis

    458 F. Supp. 3d 1090 (E.D. Mo. 2020)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Case No. 4:20-CV-00597 SEP 05-02-2020 Ranata FRANK, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant. John Bonacorsi, Blake Alexander Strode, Jacki J. Langum, Jacqueline Marie Kutnik-Bauder, Archcity Defenders, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff Michael A. Garvin, Robert H. Dierker, St. Louis City Counselors Office-2, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant Sarah E. Pitlyk, United States District Judge John Bonacorsi, Blake Alexander Strode, Jacki J. Langum,

  10. People v. Kellogg

    119 Cal.App.4th 593 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 7 times

    D042696 Filed June 17, 2004 Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, No. M853046, William H. Kronberger, Judge. Affirmed. Steven J. Carroll, Public Defender, and Laura Arnold, Deputy Public Defender, for Defendant and Appellant. Casey Gwinn, City Attorney, Susan M. Heath, Assistant City Attorney, and David M. Stotland, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent. HALLER, J. Thomas Kellogg contends his public intoxication conviction constitutes constitutionally proscribed

  11. Section 372 - Maintaining or committing public nuisance

    Cal. Pen. Code § 372   Cited 45 times
    Relating to failure to remove a public nuisance

  12. Section 647c - Unlawful obstruction of free movement of person on street, sidewalk, or other public place

    Cal. Pen. Code § 647c   Cited 22 times

    Every person who willfully and maliciously obstructs the free movement of any person on any street, sidewalk, or other public place or on or in any place open to the public is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this section affects the power of a county or a city to regulate conduct upon a street, sidewalk, or other public place or on or in a place open to the public. Ca. Pen. Code § 647c Amended by Stats. 1968, Ch. 122.