428 U.S. 364 (1976) Cited 3,047 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that an inventory search was constitutionally permissible in part because there was "no suggestion" that the search "was a pretext concealing an investigatory police motive"
Holding that the terms camping, living, and store are not "vague ... when the purpose clause of the ordinance is considered and the terms are read in that context as they should be."
Holding that "[S]o long as there is a greater number of homeless individuals in a jurisdiction than the number of available beds in shelters, the jurisdiction cannot prosecute homeless individuals for involuntarily sitting, lying, and sleeping in public."
In Cohen v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 40 Cal.3d 277, 286-287, our high court stated: “Generally, the ruling on an application for a preliminary injunction rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.
23 Cal.App.4th 1459 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994) Cited 37 times
In Tahoe Keys Property Owners' Assn. v. State Water Resources Control Bd. (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1459, 1472, the court weighed defendants' public interest activities against evidence that any harm could readily be redressed by compensatory damages and held that a preliminary injunction was therefore not appropriate.
69 Cal.App.4th 508 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999) Cited 24 times
In City of Vernon v. Central Basin Mun. WaterDist. (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 508 [ 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 650] (City of Vernon), the lone prior published case to address the provision, a member of the board of directors of a municipal water district participated in setting the uniform rates at which the district would sell reclaimed water to wholesalers.
Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 527 Cited 275 times 2 Legal Analyses
Entitling parties opposing preliminary injunctions to one continuance "to enable the opposing party to meet the application for a preliminary injunction"