35 Cited authorities

  1. Blank v. Kirwan

    39 Cal.3d 311 (Cal. 1985)   Cited 3,081 times
    Holding that the standard for a failure to state a claim is whether "the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"
  2. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.

    222 Cal.App.3d 1371 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 942 times
    Holding that a claim for breach of the implied covenant may be disregarded if it rests on the same set of facts as a claim for breach of contract
  3. Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior Court

    83 Cal.App.4th 523 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 666 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the alter ego doctrine is a mechanism for imposing liability on a parent company for the actions of its subsidiaries whereas single entity liability applies to sister corporations
  4. Campbell v. Regents of University of California

    35 Cal.4th 311 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 374 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding generally that "where an administrative remedy is provided by statute, relief must be sought from the administrative body and this remedy exhausted before the courts will act" without explicitly addressing exhaustion before the Labor Commissioner under section 98.7
  5. Gruenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co.

    9 Cal.3d 566 (Cal. 1973)   Cited 814 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "when the insurer unreasonably and in bad faith withholds payment of the claim of its insured, it is subject to liability" for violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
  6. Leek v. Cooper

    194 Cal.App.4th 399 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 175 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding "allegation that a person owns all of the corporate stock and makes all of the management decisions is insufficient to cause the court to disregard the corporate entity"
  7. Reichert v. General Ins. Co. of America

    68 Cal.2d 822 (Cal. 1968)   Cited 522 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Adding a fourth element, the plaintiff's performance or excuse for nonperformance under the contract
  8. Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. v. Am. Asphalt S., Inc.

    2 Cal.5th 505 (Cal. 2017)   Cited 112 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a tortious interference claim "protects the expectation that the relationship eventually will yield the desired benefit, not necessarily the more speculative expectation that a potentially beneficial relationship will eventually arise."
  9. Comunale v. Traders & General Ins. Co.

    50 Cal.2d 654 (Cal. 1958)   Cited 589 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an insured has a cause of action for bad faith if an insurer mishandles a claim by a third party against the insured
  10. San Diego Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Ins. Society, Inc.

    162 Cal.App.3d 358 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 245 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an insurance company must hire an independent attorney to represent its insured when the carrier reserves the right to deny coverage at a later date
  11. Section 2860 - Duty of insurer to provide independent counsel to insured

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2860   Cited 276 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Implementing Cumis rule