14 Cited authorities

Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
25 Cal.4th 826 (Cal. 2001) Cited 4,989 times 2 Legal Analyses
Concluding that the gathering and dissemination of pricing information by the petroleum companies through an independent industry service did not imply collusive action where there was no evidence the information was misused as a basis for an unlawful conspiracy; rather, evidence suggested that individual companies used all available resources “to determine capacity, supply, and pricing decisions which would maximize their own individual profits”
Kids' Universe v. In2Labs
95 Cal.App.4th 870 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) Cited 349 times
Finding expert testimony insufficient to demonstrate lost profits where a small toy store claimed that flood damage to the store caused by defendant led to $50 million in lost profits because Plaintiff's new website would have allowed it to compete in the Internet toy marketing business
Melton v. Boustred
183 Cal.App.4th 521 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) Cited 173 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding property owner could not have reasonably foreseen assaults by third parties attending party owner publicized on internet
Perez v. Van Groningen Sons, Inc.
41 Cal.3d 962 (Cal. 1986) Cited 206 times
Holding jury entitled to determine whether defendant was negligent when he asked plaintiff nephew to accompany him on one-seat tractor, from which plaintiff fell and sustained injury
Allen v. Smith
94 Cal.App.4th 1270 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) Cited 130 times
In Allen, the court observed that "[a]n appellate court has no jurisdiction to review an award of attorney fees made after entry of judgment, unless the order is separately appealed."
United Community Church v. Garcin
231 Cal.App.3d 327 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991) Cited 159 times 1 Legal Analyses
Noting the "question about what would have happened had [the lawyer] acted otherwise is one of fact unless reasonable minds could not differ as to the legal effect of the evidence presented"
Spates v. Dameron Hospital Assn.
114 Cal.App.4th 208 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003) Cited 101 times
Holding next of kin have possessory rights in the remains of a deceased's body
Branco v. Kearny Moto Park, Inc.
37 Cal.App.4th 184 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995) Cited 75 times
Holding that the sport of bicycle motocross (BMX) does not inherently require jumps that are designed in a way that creates an extreme risk of injury
Paramount Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court
227 Cal.App.4th 226 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014) Cited 34 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Paramount, the appellate court determined that the trial court erred in reconsidering a prior order denying a motion for summary judgment without giving the parties an opportunity to provide further oral or written argument before issuing a new ruling.
City of Pasadena v. Superior Court
228 Cal.App.4th 1228 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014) Cited 24 times 2 Legal Analyses
B254800 2014-08-14 CITY OF PASADENA, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Respondent; Mercury Casualty Company, Real Party in Interest. See 8 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (10th ed. 2005) Constitutional Law, § 1132 et seq. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS in mandate. Joseph R. Kalin, Judge. Petition is denied. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC491467) CROSKEY See 8 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (10th ed. 2005) Constitutional Law, § 1132 et seq. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS

defendant mattnew kittells memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs moti

14 Cited authorities

Finding expert testimony insufficient to demonstrate lost profits where a small toy store claimed that flood damage to the store caused by defendant led to $50 million in lost profits because Plaintiff's new website would have allowed it to compete in the Internet toy marketing business

Holding property owner could not have reasonably foreseen assaults by third parties attending party owner publicized on internet

Holding jury entitled to determine whether defendant was negligent when he asked plaintiff nephew to accompany him on one-seat tractor, from which plaintiff fell and sustained injury

In Allen, the court observed that "[a]n appellate court has no jurisdiction to review an award of attorney fees made after entry of judgment, unless the order is separately appealed."

Noting the "question about what would have happened had [the lawyer] acted otherwise is one of fact unless reasonable minds could not differ as to the legal effect of the evidence presented"

Holding next of kin have possessory rights in the remains of a deceased's body

Holding that the sport of bicycle motocross (BMX) does not inherently require jumps that are designed in a way that creates an extreme risk of injury

In Paramount, the appellate court determined that the trial court erred in reconsidering a prior order denying a motion for summary judgment without giving the parties an opportunity to provide further oral or written argument before issuing a new ruling.