Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
578 U.S. 330 (2016) Cited 7,975 times 443 Legal AnalysesHolding that a statutory violation, without more, did not give rise to Article III standing
Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court
51 Cal.4th 310 (Cal. 2011) Cited 1,602 times 27 Legal AnalysesHolding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"
Teal v. Superior Court
60 Cal.4th 595 (Cal. 2014) Cited 355 timesHolding resentencing provision of Three Strikes Law creates substantial right affecting personal liberty interest
Hale v. Morgan
22 Cal.3d 388 (Cal. 1978) Cited 359 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that although a mandatory $100–per–day penalty scheme was not necessarily facially unconstitutional, the imposition of a $17,300 penalty under the statute was constitutionally excessive in that case, given the defendant's lesser culpability and the possibility of an unmerited windfall to the plaintiff
S. Cal. Gas Co. v. Superior Court
7 Cal.5th 391 (Cal. 2019) Cited 109 timesHolding that purely economic business losses sustained as a result of a natural gas leak were not recoverable in part because of "concerns about limitless liability and unending litigation"
Daro v. Superior Court
151 Cal.App.4th 1079 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) Cited 150 timesHolding that, to establish standing under the UCL, "there must be a causal connection between the harm suffered and the unlawful business activity," and that the "causal connection is broken when a complaining party would suffer the same harm whether or not a defendant complied with the law"
Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.
67 Cal.2d 695 (Cal. 1967) Cited 438 times 1 Legal AnalysesUsing fluid recovery to benefit taxicab customers overcharged by defendant
Gardner v. UICI
508 F.3d 559 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 119 timesFinding case law supporting removal to suggest that removal was not "objectively unreasonable"
Huff v. Securitas Sec. Servs. USA, Inc.
23 Cal.App.5th 745 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018) Cited 58 times 9 Legal AnalysesRefusing to interpret statute prior to retrial
Connor v. First Student, Inc.
5 Cal.5th 1026 (Cal. 2018) Cited 30 times 2 Legal AnalysesS229428 08-20-2018 Eileen CONNOR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FIRST STUDENT, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. Sundeen Salinas & Pyle, Hunter Pyle Law, Hunter Pyle, Tanya Tambling, Rachel Evans, Chad Saunders, Oakland; Lewis, Feinberg, Renaker, Lee & Jackson, Lewis, Feinberg, Lee & Jackson, Feinberg, Jackson, Worthman & Wasow, Todd F. Jackson and Catha Worthman, Oakland, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Nicklas A. Akers, Assistant Attorney General, Michele
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 23,013 times 16 Legal AnalysesAllowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
Section 1681n - Civil liability for willful noncompliance
15 U.S.C. § 1681n Cited 2,380 times 42 Legal AnalysesIn §§1681n and 1681o, the Act authorizes consumer suits for money damages against "[a]ny person" who willfully or negligently fails to comply with this directive.