14 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Morris

    53 Cal.3d 152 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 567 times
    Requiring use of peremptory challenges and dissatisfaction with jury to claim erroneous denial of challenge for cause
  2. FPI Development, Inc. v. Nakashima

    231 Cal.App.3d 367 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 288 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Affirming summary judgment
  3. Juge v. County of Sacramento

    12 Cal.App.4th 59 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 94 times
    Holding that a "trial court has the inherent power to grant summary judgment on a ground not explicitly tendered by the moving party" if the party opposing the motion had an opportunity to respond to the issue
  4. Bowen v. Ryan

    163 Cal.App.4th 916 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 50 times
    In Bowen, a civil case, a dentist who had treated as many as 45,000 patients during his 28-year career was accused of choking a patient in order to give him an injection and then shoving him against a wall.
  5. Brokopp v. Ford Motor Co.

    71 Cal.App.3d 841 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977)   Cited 116 times
    In Brokopp the court stated: “ ‘The knowledge, opinions, and report of an expert consulted by an attorney in preparation of his case remain immune from disclosure under the attorney’s work-product privilege as long as the expert does not change his status as a consultant-expert.
  6. FMC Corp. v. Plaisted & Companies

    61 Cal.App.4th 1132 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 58 times   8 Legal Analyses
    In FMC Corp. v. Plaisted and Cos., 61 Cal.App.4th 1132, 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 467 (1998), another California Court of Appeal panel held that, where "coverage is ultimately keyed to and limited by the concept of `occurrence,'" an insured may recover an amount no greater than the policy limit for one policy period.
  7. People v. Hoze

    195 Cal.App.3d 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 22 times
    In People v. Hoze (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 949, 955, this court found no error because as a matter of law the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting impeachment with defendant’s priors.
  8. Webb v. Van Noort

    239 Cal.App.2d 472 (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)   Cited 16 times

    Docket No. 504. January 19, 1966. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. Robert K. Meyers, Judge. Affirmed. Assigned by the Chairman of the Judicial Council. Action for wrongful death resulting from a nonimpact automobile accident. Judgment for defendants affirmed. Philander Brooks Beadle, John T. Tully and Barreiro Dilling for Plaintiffs and Appellants. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Coyle Best and William B. Boone for Defendants and Respondents. BROWN (R.M.), J. Plaintiffs

  9. Larson v. Larsen

    72 Cal.App. 169 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925)   Cited 9 times
    In Larson the court said: "It has been repeatedly held that it is not competent to prove the commission of independent crimes by the defendant, the evidence of which has no tendency to prove some material fact in connection with the particular crime charged.
  10. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,386 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  11. Section 352 - Balancing of probative value with prejudice

    Cal. Evid. Code § 352   Cited 12,871 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Giving a trial court discretion to exclude evidence "if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury"
  12. Section 1101 - Evidence of character to prove conduct

    Cal. Evid. Code § 1101   Cited 6,078 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Regarding admissibility of character evidence
  13. Section 1200 - Hearsay rule

    Cal. Evid. Code § 1200   Cited 2,214 times
    Prohibiting the introduction of "a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated" subject to certain exceptions
  14. Section 1104 - Traits of care or skill

    Cal. Evid. Code § 1104   Cited 40 times
    Excluding evidence of an employee's prior accidents, when the employer assumes vicarious liability for the employee's negligence