70 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 28,036 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.

    528 U.S. 167 (2000)   Cited 7,204 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing
  3. Bennett v. Spear

    520 U.S. 154 (1997)   Cited 3,704 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Final Biological Opinion has "legal consequences," even though the action agency is not legally obligated to accept the opinion's recommendations or conclusions, because the opinion "alter the legal regime to which the action agency is subject"
  4. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assoc. of the United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

    463 U.S. 29 (1983)   Cited 6,654 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that " `settled course of behavior embodies the agency's informed judgment that, by pursuing that course, it will carry out the policies [of applicable statutes or regulations]'"
  5. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

    542 U.S. 55 (2004)   Cited 1,480 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that agency can be compelled to act if time period is specified by law
  6. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe

    401 U.S. 402 (1971)   Cited 5,976 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding a decision is committed to agency discretion when there is "no law to apply"
  7. Sierra Club v. Morton

    405 U.S. 727 (1972)   Cited 2,789 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff-organization did not establish Article III standing for injunctive relief where the organization failed to show that its members would be affected by the actions it sought to enjoin
  8. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Labs

    471 U.S. 707 (1985)   Cited 1,192 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding local health ordinance not preempted because "the regulation of health and safety matters is primarily, and historically, a matter of local concern"
  9. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill

    437 U.S. 153 (1978)   Cited 1,512 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that budget appropriations cannot alter meaning of statute
  10. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 470 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,861 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 706 - Scope of review

    5 U.S.C. § 706   Cited 20,510 times   185 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"
  13. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,095 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the use of declarations instead
  14. Section 702 - Right of review

    5 U.S.C. § 702   Cited 7,091 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting judicial review of "agency action"
  15. Section 704 - Actions reviewable

    5 U.S.C. § 704   Cited 4,269 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Granting judicial review over " final agency action"
  16. Section 1531 - Congressional findings and declaration of purposes and policy

    16 U.S.C. § 1531   Cited 1,675 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Finding and declaring that "various species of fish, wildlife, and plants in the United States have been rendered extinct" while "other species ... have been so depleted in numbers that they are in danger of or threatened with extinction ...."
  17. Section 1536 - Interagency cooperation

    16 U.S.C. § 1536   Cited 1,321 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that every federal agency "insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency . . . is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species"
  18. Section 1540 - Penalties and enforcement

    16 U.S.C. § 1540   Cited 995 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Requiring such notice
  19. Section 1532 - Definitions

    16 U.S.C. § 1532   Cited 869 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Defining "conservation" as "the use of all methods and procedures which are necessary to bring any endangered species or threatened species to the point at which the measures provided pursuant to this chapter are no longer necessary"
  20. Section 1533 - Determination of endangered species and threatened species

    16 U.S.C. § 1533   Cited 817 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Requiring periodic review of listed species
  21. Section 402.14 - Formal consultation

    50 C.F.R. § 402.14   Cited 706 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Requiring disclosure of Draft Biological Opinions to private applicants if requested
  22. Section 402.02 - Definitions

    50 C.F.R. § 402.02   Cited 489 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Defining "action" as "all activities or programs of any kind authorized, funded, or carried out, in whole or in part, by Federal agencies in the United States or upon the high seas. Examples include, but are not limited to . . . actions directly or indirectly causing modifications to the land, water, or air"
  23. Section 17.3 - [Effective 5/13/2024] Definitions

    50 C.F.R. § 17.3   Cited 275 times   11 Legal Analyses
    In 50 C.F.R. § 17.3, petitioner Secretary of the Interior further defines "harm" to include "significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife."
  24. Section 402.16 - Reinitiation of consultation

    50 C.F.R. § 402.16   Cited 202 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Requiring the Services to reinitiate consultation in specified circumstances, including when "new information reveals effects of the action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered"
  25. Section 402.12 - Biological assessments

    50 C.F.R. § 402.12   Cited 169 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring the action agency to solicit “a list of any listed or proposed species or designated or proposed critical habitat that may be present in the action area” or to provide such a list of species or habitat to the Service for inclusion in the BA
  26. Section 17.31 - Prohibitions

    50 C.F.R. § 17.31   Cited 92 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Taking of threatened or endangered species
  27. Section 261.50 - Orders

    36 C.F.R. § 261.50   Cited 30 times

    (a) The Chief, each Regional Forester, each Experiment Station Director, the Administrator of the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit and each Forest Supervisor may issue orders which close or restrict the use of described areas within the area over which he has jurisdiction. An order may close an area to entry or may restrict the use of an area by applying any or all of the prohibitions authorized in this subpart or any portion thereof. (b) The Chief, each Regional Forester, each Experiment Station

  28. Section 261.58 - Occupancy and use

    36 C.F.R. § 261.58   Cited 27 times

    When provided by an order, the following are prohibited: (a) Camping for a period longer than allowed by the order. (b) Entering or using a developed recreation site or portion thereof. (c) Entering or remaining in a campground during night periods prescribed in the order except for persons who are occupying such campgrounds. (d) Occupying a developed recreation site with prohibited camping equipment prescribed by the order. (e) Camping. (f) Using a campsite or other area described in the order by

  29. Section 219.15 - Project and activity consistency with the plan

    36 C.F.R. § 219.15   Cited 19 times
    Offering these four options if "a proposed project ... would not be consistent with the application plan components"
  30. Section 261.53 - Special closures

    36 C.F.R. § 261.53   Cited 10 times

    When provided in an order, it is prohibited to go into or be upon any area which is closed for the protection of: (a) Threatened, endangered, rare, unique, or vanishing species of plants, animals, birds or fish. (b) Special biological communities. (c) Objects or areas of historical, archeological, geological, or paleontological interest. (d) Scientific experiments or investigations. (e) Public health or safety. (f) Property. (g) The privacy of tribal activities for traditional and cultural purposes