§Why CasetextPricing

Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Salazar et al

MEMORANDUM in Support of 188 Second MOTION Injunction Pending Appeal

13 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 16,764 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

  2. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell

    632 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 3,896 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a “serious questions” version of the sliding scale approach to preliminary injunctions survives Winter

  3. American Trucking v. City of Los Angeles

    559 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,264 times
    Holding plaintiff seeking injunction "not entitled to relief" in absence of showing "likelihood of irreparable harm"

  4. Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. Flowers

    408 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 202 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Corps must consider the environmental impact of an entire residential subdivision before granting a permit to fill natural waterways running through the subdivision

  5. Lopez v. Heckler

    713 F.2d 1432 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 281 times
    Holding that all a claimant must do to satisfy the presentment requirement is to “specifically present the claim that his benefits should not be terminated”

  6. Mayweathers v. Newland

    258 F.3d 930 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 148 times
    Holding that district courts may renew preliminary injunctions under the PLRA while an appeal is pending, and considering the merits of the renewed injunction

  7. Sierra Club v. Bosworth

    510 F.3d 1016 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding promulgation of categorical exclusion not major federal action requiring an EA or EIS

  8. South Fork v. U.S. Dept

    588 F.3d 718 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that a failure to discuss mercury emissions from a nearby mining facility in an EIS was not excused by the fact that the facility "operate[d] pursuant to a state permit under the Clean Air Act," because " non-NEPA document ... cannot satisfy a federal agency's obligations under NEPA"

  9. AT & T Mobility, LLC v. Bernardi

    No. C 11-03992 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)   Cited 6 times

    No. C 11-03992 CRB No. C 11-04412 CRB 10-26-2011 AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Plaintiff, v. LESLIE BERNARDI, ET AL., Defendants. DEBORAH SCHROEDER ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendant. CHARLES R. BREYER MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AT&T Mobility LLC ("ATTM"), filed a Complaint and request for preliminary injunction in this case on August 12, 2011, requesting that this Court enjoin two pending arbitrations filed against ATTM. Dkt. 1. On September 6, 2011, Deborah Schroeder

  10. Bickoff v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    CASE NO. 11-CV-2452 BEN (WVG) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)

    CASE NO. 11-CV-2452 BEN (WVG) 11-02-2011 BRUCE F. BICKOFF, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO, N.A., and DOES 1 through 20, Inclusive, Defendants. Roger T. Benitez ORDER: (1) GRANTING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (2) SETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [Docket No. 3] Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Application for a Temporary Restraining Order that temporarily restrains Defendant from proceeding with the trustee's sale of Plaintiff's real property scheduled for November

  11. Rule 62 - Stay of Proceedings to Enforce a Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 62   Cited 4,119 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Granting of stay is discretionary

  12. Rule 8 - Stay or Injunction Pending Appeal

    Fed. R. App. P. 8   Cited 1,394 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Referring to interim relief from “the judgment or order of a district court pending appeal” as “a stay”

  13. Section 3809.423 - How long does my plan of operations remain in effect?

    43 C.F.R. § 3809.423   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Your plan of operations remains in effect as long as you are conducting operations, unless BLM suspends or revokes your plan of operations for failure to comply with this subpart. 43 C.F.R. § 3809.423