Huber v. Taylor
469 F.3d 67 (3d Cir. 2006) Cited 154 timesHolding that plaintiffs did not waive choice of law issue on grounds that "we have been reluctant to apply the waiver doctrine when only an issue of law is raised"
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Peppers
64 Ill. 2d 187 (Ill. 1976) Cited 349 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the trial court in a declaratory judgment action abuses its discretion when it determines any of the “ultimate facts upon which recovery is predicated” in the underlying case
Nandorf, Inc. v. CNA Insurance Companies
134 Ill. App. 3d 134 (Ill. App. Ct. 1985) Cited 69 times 1 Legal AnalysesFinding conflict when punitive damages not covered by policy
In re American Continental Corporation/Lincoln Savings & Loan Securities Litigation
794 F. Supp. 1424 (D. Ariz. 1992) Cited 45 timesHolding that Resolution Trust Corporation could sue for losses to subsidiary of failed thrift institution where loans made by the subsidiary were funded by the institution
Dietz-Britton v. Smythe
139 Ohio App. 3d 337 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000) Cited 23 timesNo. 76435 and 76455. Decided: October 2, 2000. Civil appeal from Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-338889. For plaintiff-appellant: For defendant-appellees: TYLER L. MATHEWS, THOMAS C. SCHRADER, McDonald, Hopkins, Burke Haber, 2100 Bank One Center, 600 Superior Avenue, E., Cleveland, OH 44114-2643, JACK D. MAISTROS, Climaco, Lefkowitz, Peca, Wilcox Garafoli, The Halle Building, #900, 1228 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44115-1891. JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JOHN T. PATTON, J.: Pursuant to the terms
Utica Mutual Ins. Company v. David Agency Ins., Inc.
327 F. Supp. 2d 922 (N.D. Ill. 2004) Cited 15 timesCase No. 04 C 1206. July 6, 2004 Gregory G. Vacala, Rubin, Patton, et al, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Jill B. Berkeley, Seth David Lamden, Schiff Hardin LLP, Chicago, IL, Tracy Ellen Stevenson, Carri Ann Conlon, Chuhak Tecson, Chicago, IL, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATHEW KENNELLY, District Judge Utica Mutual Insurance Company ("Utica") filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that it is not obligated to indemnify its insured, the David Agency Insurance, Inc. and David Meilahn
Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Board of Trustees
937 F.2d 331 (7th Cir. 1991) Cited 26 timesNo. 90-2371. Argued February 21, 1991. Decided July 15, 1991. Robert M. Chemers, Pretzel Stouffer, Jerry L. McDowell, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, Chicago, Ill., and Michael L. Cohen, J. Marks Moore, III, and James W. Bartlett, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff-appellant. Shari R. Rhode, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Ill., Theodore LeBlang, M. Douglas Henderson, Richard G. Higgerson, Springfield, Ill., and Michele Odorizzi, and William
Essex Ins. Co. v. Stage 2, Inc.
14 F.3d 1178 (7th Cir. 1994) Cited 17 timesHolding that an insurance policy in which "claims, accusations, or charges of negligent hiring, placement, training or supervision arising from actual or alleged assault or battery are not covered" did not cover a suit alleging the breach of a duty of care for failing to protect someone from assault by other patrons
Stewart v. General Motors Corp.
756 F.2d 1285 (7th Cir. 1985) Cited 18 timesDenying additional attorney's fees where party "was in compliance with the decree"
Selby v. Revlon Consumer Products Corp.
6 F. Supp. 2d 577 (N.D. Tex. 1997) Cited 5 timesHolding that the substantial relationship test "also concerns the duty of loyalty to a former client"