477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 204,929 times 32 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is 'genuine,' that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
551 U.S. 877 (2007) Cited 371 times 69 Legal Analyses
Holding that per se treatment is inappropriate where "it cannot be stated with any degree of confidence that [the challenged restraint] ‘always or almost always tends to restrict competition and decrease output’ "
370 U.S. 294 (1962) Cited 1,688 times 23 Legal Analyses
Holding judgment final and appealable where district court passed on every prayer for relief in the complaint and ordered full divestiture of stock, although court had not yet approved a divestiture plan
468 U.S. 85 (1984) Cited 598 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that NCAA restrictions on televising college football games are subject to Rule of Reason analysis for the “critical” reason that “horizontal restraints on competition are essential if the product is to be available at all”