[Copyrighted Material Omitted] Emmanuel Roy, Esq., Roy & Associates, P.C., Brooklyn, NY, for Plaintiffs. Douglas E. Rowe, Esq., Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, East Meadow, NY, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge. Plaintiff Junior Mentor (" Mentor" ) moves to (1) add Pouttley A. Pierre as a Plaintiff in this action; (2) circulate a Notice of Pendency and Consent to Join pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (" FLSA" ), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and (3) certify
No. C83-308A. May 31, 1985. Benjamin T. Chinni, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff. Joseph O'Leary, Akron, Ohio, for defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID DOWD JR., District Judge Plaintiff, the Secretary of Labor, filed the above-captioned case against defendants, Beverage Express, Inc., Pat Joe's Drive-Thru, Inc., Joseph Moneskey and Pat Camp, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. The
(a) The Senate Report on the 1961 amendments states as follows, with respect to the meaning of related activities: Within the meaning of this term, activities are "related" when they are the same or similar, such as those of the individual retail or service stores in a chain, or departments of an establishment operated through leasing arrangements. They are also "related" when they are auxiliary and service activities such as central office and warehousing activities and bookkeeping, auditing, purchasing
Under the definition, the "enterprise" consists of "the related activities performed * * * for a common business purpose." All of the activities comprising the enterprise must be "related." Activities serving a single business purpose may be related, although different, but other activities which are not related are not included in the enterprise. The definition makes clear that the enterprise includes all such related activities which are performed through "unified operation" or "common control