§Why CasetextPricing

Castellano et al v. Global Credit & Collection Corporation et al

RESPONSE in Opposition re First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Complaint, and/or Other Responsive Pleading

5 Cited authorities

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership

    507 U.S. 380 (1993)   Cited 7,904 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that clients must be held accountable for the acts and omissions of their attorneys

  2. In re Painewebber Ltd. Partner. Litigation

    147 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 141 times
    Holding that the district court "reached the right conclusion when it declined to grant plaintiff an enlargement of the deadline date to opt out" and did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiff's "motion to exclude himself from the Class nearly a year after the deadline to do so had expired"

  3. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 357,280 times   950 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  4. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,778 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  5. Section 1692 - Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

    15 U.S.C. § 1692   Cited 15,193 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Finding that abusive debt-collection practices lead to "personal bankruptcies," "marital instability," "loss of jobs," and "invasions of individual privacy"