6 Cited authorities

  1. In re Southern Pacific Funding Corp. Sec. Lit.

    83 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (D. Or. 1999)   Cited 13 times
    Sustaining complaint because "overall presentation" alleged securities fraud
  2. Powers v. Eichen

    961 F. Supp. 233 (S.D. Cal. 1997)   Cited 15 times
    Finding that defendants had standing to challenge subpoenasduces tecum served on non-parties pursuant to PSLRA
  3. Fazio v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.

    Nos. 1:02CV157, 1:02CV370, 1:02CV382 (N.D. Ohio May. 16, 2002)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 1:02CV157, 1:02CV370, 1:02CV382 May 16, 2002 MEMORANDUM OF OPINION JOHN M. MANOS, United States District Judge On May 7, 2002, the Plaintiffs in these actions jointly filed a Consolidated Motion To Lift the Stay of Discovery. The parties have fully briefed these issues. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED as to all cases. I. FACTS These actions arise out of the conduct of Frank Gruttadauria, who formerly acted as an investment broker for each of the Plaintiffs. He is charged with

  4. Hockey v. Medhekar

    932 F. Supp. 249 (N.D. Cal. 1996)   Cited 2 times

    No. C-96-0815 MHP. July 11, 1996. William S. Lerach, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach LLP, San Diego, CA, Richard S. Schiffrin, Michael D. Craig, Schiffrin Craig, Ltd., Bala Cynwyd, PA, for Robert Hockey. Norman J. Blears, Joyce M. Cartun, Heller Ehrman White McAuliffe, Palo Alto, CA, Gregory E. Barton, Alliance Semiconductor Corporation, San Jose, CA, for Ajit K. Medhekar, Sid Agrawal, C.N. Reddy, C.N. Reddy Investments, Inc., N. Damodar Reddy, Alliance Semiconductor Corp. Norman J. Blears, Joyce

  5. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,529 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  6. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,460 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party