§Why CasetextPricing

Campanale et al v. Capital One Services, LLC

RESPONSE in opposition re MOTION for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law

30 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 267,684 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 280,676 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

  3. Tellabs v. Makor Issues Rights

    551 U.S. 308 (2007)   Cited 9,575 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a strong inference is one that is "cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference"

  4. Keating v. City of Miami

    598 F.3d 753 (11th Cir. 2010)   Cited 561 times
    Holding that individuals have "a clearly established right to assemble, protest, and demonstrate peacefully"

  5. GSW, Inc. v. Long County

    999 F.2d 1508 (11th Cir. 1993)   Cited 853 times
    Discussing White, 460 U.S. at 206, 103 S.Ct. 1042

  6. Harrison v. Benchmark Elec. Huntsville

    593 F.3d 1206 (11th Cir. 2010)   Cited 112 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a non-disabled plaintiff [must] at least show some damages (emotional, pecuniary, or otherwise) caused by a § 12112(d) violation" (footnote omitted)

  7. Millennium Communications & Fulfillment, Inc. v. Office of the Attorney General

    761 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 130 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that FDUTPA applies to transactions in Florida even when the parties are not Florida residents

  8. Housh v. Peth

    165 Ohio St. 35 (Ohio 1956)   Cited 267 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding a state constitutional right to privacy

  9. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Ginsberg

    863 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 2003)   Cited 53 times
    Distinguishing between Alabama and Florida's versions of the law on the basis of Alabama's adoption of the Restatement's reliance on "private activities" while Florida requires intrusion into "private quarters"

  10. Oppenheim v. I.C. System, Inc.

    695 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2010)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that thirty-five to forty telephone calls over a three month period regarding an outstanding debt did not constitute outrageous conduct

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 362,493 times   962 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 164,394 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

  13. Section 559.72 - Prohibited practices generally

    Fla. Stat. § 559.72   Cited 479 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting an "attempt ... to enforce a debt when [the debt collector] knows that the debt is not legitimate"

  14. Section 559.55 - Definitions

    Fla. Stat. § 559.55   Cited 338 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Including "debtor" in the same definition