23 Cited authorities

Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Env't
523 U.S. 83 (1998) Cited 10,733 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court "act ultra vires" when it assumes "hypothetical jurisdiction" in order to rule on the merits
Hafer v. Melo
502 U.S. 21 (1991) Cited 7,419 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that state officials may be sued under § 1983 in their personal capacity for damages caused by actions taken by them in their official capacities
Lapides v. Board of Regents of University System
535 U.S. 613 (2002) Cited 2,186 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a state that joins in the removal of state-law claims to federal court waives its Eleventh Amendment immunity on those causes of action
Edelman v. Jordan
415 U.S. 651 (1974) Cited 8,120 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that waiver may be found in "express language" or by "overwhelming implications from the text"
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
527 U.S. 666 (1999) Cited 1,661 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding there is no fundamental property right in "the activity of doing business, or the activity of making a profit"
Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho
521 U.S. 261 (1997) Cited 1,649 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that, because "navigable waters uniquely implicate sovereign interests," there exists a "strong presumption of state ownership" of these waters
Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon
473 U.S. 234 (1985) Cited 2,003 times
Holding that a state's consent to suit in state court does not waive a state's immunity to suit in federal court
Patsy v. Florida Board of Regents
457 U.S. 496 (1982) Cited 1,712 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs suing under § 1983 are not required to have exhausted state administrative remedies
Zatler v. Wainwright
802 F.2d 397 (11th Cir. 1986) Cited 1,039 times
Holding that no deliberate indifference existed even though "'on at least one occasion,' while in protective custody, [the plaintiff-prisoner] was housed with another inmate who physically attacked him"
Summit Medical Associates v. Pryor
180 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 1999) Cited 320 times
Holding that the portion of a district court's order denying a motion to dismiss on standing grounds was not "inextricably intertwined with" or "necessary to ensure meaningful review of" another portion of the order denying a motion on Eleventh Amendment grounds, because the appellant's standing arguments were "completely irrelevant to" their Eleventh Amendment arguments

Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

23 Cited authorities

Holding that a court "act ultra vires" when it assumes "hypothetical jurisdiction" in order to rule on the merits

Holding that state officials may be sued under § 1983 in their personal capacity for damages caused by actions taken by them in their official capacities

Holding that a state that joins in the removal of state-law claims to federal court waives its Eleventh Amendment immunity on those causes of action

Holding that waiver may be found in "express language" or by "overwhelming implications from the text"

Holding there is no fundamental property right in "the activity of doing business, or the activity of making a profit"

Holding that, because "navigable waters uniquely implicate sovereign interests," there exists a "strong presumption of state ownership" of these waters

Holding that a state's consent to suit in state court does not waive a state's immunity to suit in federal court

Holding that plaintiffs suing under § 1983 are not required to have exhausted state administrative remedies

Holding that no deliberate indifference existed even though "'on at least one occasion,' while in protective custody, [the plaintiff-prisoner] was housed with another inmate who physically attacked him"