§Why CasetextPricing

CALHOUN v. DOAN

Memorandum in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6

5 Cited authorities

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership

    507 U.S. 380 (1993)   Cited 7,904 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that clients must be held accountable for the acts and omissions of their attorneys

  2. Yesudian ex Rel. U.S. v. Howard University

    270 F.3d 969 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 90 times
    Holding district courts can grant even after-the-fact deadline extensions without finding excusable neglect if the other party was not prejudiced

  3. In re Vitamins Antitrust Class Actions

    327 F.3d 1207 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 62 times
    Affirming district court's grant of discretionary relief where party filed motion to modify final order twelve days after its entry and two days after the party discovered that it had not opted-out

  4. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 335,102 times   160 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  5. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,778 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."