§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Jamar Bethune, Appellant.

Brief

11 Cited authorities

  1. Kentucky v. Stincer

    482 U.S. 730 (1987)   Cited 1,585 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exclusion of a defendant from an ex parte in-chambers hearing at which the competency of two child witnesses was determined did not violate due process

  2. Illinois v. Allen

    397 U.S. 337 (1970)   Cited 2,885 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant can forfeit his Sixth Amendment right to be present in trial if he insists on being “so disorderly, disruptive, and disrespectful of the court that his trial cannot be carried on with him in the courtroom”

  3. Snyder v. Massachusetts

    291 U.S. 97 (1934)   Cited 2,462 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant had no right of presence at jury’s viewing of the crime scene because he couldn’t have gained anything from being there

  4. People v. Morales

    80 N.Y.2d 450 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 134 times
    In Morales, the issue before the Court was whether it was reversible error to exclude the defendant when the court preliminarily examined a child witness to determine whether she understood the nature of an oath.

  5. People v. Santorelli

    95 N.Y.2d 412 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 102 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district attorney did not violate Brady obligations by failing to turn over FBI 302s because the reports were not in the actual possession of the district attorney, the federal authorities refused to allow the district attorney access to the reports, and the trial court made a finding that the federal and state investigators acted independently

  6. People v. Alomar

    93 N.Y.2d 239 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 91 times
    Addressing criminal defendant's due process challenge derived from the trial judge's refusal to recuse himself

  7. People v. Carney

    58 N.Y.2d 51 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 35 times

    Argued November 12, 1982 Decided December 15, 1982 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ALFRED ASCIONE, J. Brian Sheppard and William E. Hellerstein for appellant. Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney ( Catherine M.A. McCaulif and Norman Barclay of counsel), for respondent. Chief Judge COOKE. A suspect may not be frisked by a police officer who has no knowledge of facts that would provide a basis for suspecting that the individual is armed or

  8. People v. Laracuente

    125 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)   Cited 9 times

    December 31, 1986 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.). Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing to settle the transcript, in accordance herewith, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Kings County, shall file its report and a settled transcript with all convenient speed. On appeal, the defendant asserts, inter alia, that the trial court's instructions to the jury contained numerous confusing and

  9. People v. Gonzales

    439 N.E.2d 351 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 12 times

    Argued June 11, 1982 Decided June 23, 1982 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, M. MICHAEL POTOKER, J. Claude Castro for appellant. Elizabeth Holtzman, District Attorney ( Allan Root, Barbara D. Underwood and Beth S. Lasky of counsel), for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant's contention that the trial court committed reversible error in rereading its original charge on certain legal concepts

  10. People v. Carney

    73 A.D.2d 9 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)   Cited 13 times
    Discussing historic reliance on recollection of trial judge in developing record for appeal