§Why CasetextPricing

Richard Altman, Respondent,v.285 West Fourth LLC, Appellant.

Brief

34 Cited authorities

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.

    545 U.S. 546 (2005)   Cited 4,159 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the supplemental jurisdiction statute permits the exercise of diversity jurisdiction over additional plaintiffs who fail to satisfy the minimum amount-in-controversy requirement, as long as the other elements of diversity jurisdiction are present and at least one named plaintiff does satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement

  2. Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7480 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 372 times
    In Roberts, this Court rejected DHCR's long-standing statutory interpretation and concluded that luxury deregulation was unavailable in any building during receipt of J–51 benefits (13 N.Y.3d at 285–287, 890 N.Y.S.2d 388, 918 N.E.2d 900).

  3. Dixon v. 105 W. 75th St. LLC

    148 A.D.3d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)   Cited 77 times
    In Dixon, the Appellate Division, First Department held that, on a pre-answer motion to dismiss, the landlord satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it made the necessary improvements to qualify for first rent because it established that it substantially altered the character of the apartment in that it connected it to the new penthouse.

  4. United States v. Dickerson

    310 U.S. 554 (1940)   Cited 165 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress suspended operation of statute by restricting use of appropriated funds

  5. Park v. N.Y. State Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal

    150 A.D.3d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)   Cited 49 times
    In Matter of Park v NY State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, (150 AD3d 105 [1st Dept 2017]lv denied 30 NY3d 961 [2017])

  6. DeKalb Cnty. Pension Fund v. TransOcean Ltd.

    817 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2016)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party could not join the case under Rule 17 where it had previously failed to exercise "minimal diligence" to join the case or bring its own

  7. Frank v. Meadowlakes Development Corp.

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2410 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 54 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Frank, we held that CPLR article 16 limited the amount that can be recovered in indemnity when a tortfeasor's liability is 50% or less.

  8. Modell Co. v. Minister

    68 N.Y.2d 456 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that "a party is not free to remain silent in an action in which he is the defendant and then bring a second action seeking relief inconsistent with the judgment in the first action by asserting what is simply a new legal theory"

  9. Jemrock Realty Co. v. Krugman

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 211 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 31 times

    No. 59 SSM 59. Decided January 14, 2010. APPEAL, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, from an order of that Court, entered May 19, 2009. The Appellate Division affirmed an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department (op 18 Misc 3d 15), which had (1) reversed an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jean T. Schneider, J.), entered after a non-jury trial, to the extent it determined

  10. Altman v. 285 West Fourth, LLC

    127 A.D.3d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 19 times

    14968, 155942/14. 04-28-2015 Richard ALTMAN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 285 WEST FOURTH, LLC, Defendant–Respondent.  Lawrence W. Rader, New York, for appellant. Amsterdam & Lewinter, LLP, New York (Joseph P. Mitchell of counsel), for respondent. Lawrence W. Rader, New York, for appellant. Amsterdam & Lewinter, LLP, New York (Joseph P. Mitchell of counsel), for respondent. TOM, J.P., SWEENY, MANZANET–DANIELS, CLARK, KAPNICK, JJ. Opinion Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County

  11. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation