6 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Catu

    4 N.Y.3d 242 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 506 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Vacating guilty plea when defendant not told of PRS because PRS is a "definite, immediate and largely automatic" direct consequence of sentence
  2. People v. Hill

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 8782 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 166 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Hill, the new sentence consisted of a period of imprisonment less than the determinate sentence originally imposed, followed by a period of PRS that together equaled the incarceratory period of the original sentence (see Hill, 9 N.Y.3d at 192, 849 N.Y.S.2d 13, 879 N.E.2d 152).
  3. People v. Bright

    71 N.Y.2d 376 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 165 times
    Holding the PABT was a public place and invalidating loitering statute as unconstitutionally vague
  4. People v. Foley

    94 N.Y.2d 668 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 89 times
    Concluding the court was " 'hard pressed to ascertain any legitimate commerce that is derived from the intentional transmission of sexually graphic images to minors for the purpose of luring them into sexual activity' "
  5. People v. Boyd

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3627 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 62 times
    In Boyd, the Court extended this exception to cases where a court informs the defendant at his plea that his sentence includes a period of supervised release, without specifying the exact duration.
  6. People v. Pignataro

    93 A.D.3d 1250 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 2 times

    2012-03-16 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony S. PIGNATARO, Defendant–Appellant. Appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered May 4, 2010. Defendant was resentenced pursuant to Penal Law § 70.85.Charles J. Greenberg, Buffalo, for defendant-appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (Michael J. Hillery of Counsel), for respondent. Appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski