62 Cited authorities

  1. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell

    538 U.S. 408 (2003)   Cited 2,202 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an award of $145 million in punitive damages on a $1 million compensatory verdict violated due process
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore

    517 U.S. 559 (1996)   Cited 2,467 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a $2 million punitive damages award was "grossly excessive" and therefore exceeded the constitutional limit
  3. Cooper Industries v. Leatherman Tool Group

    532 U.S. 424 (2001)   Cited 700 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that constitutionality of jury's punitive damage award is subject to de novo review
  4. Ashland Mgt. v. Janien

    82 N.Y.2d 395 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 532 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that whether trade secret is secret is generally quest on of fact
  5. Continental Cas. v. Rapid-Am

    80 N.Y.2d 640 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 526 times
    Holding that these terms are to be construed narrowly as barring coverage "only when the insured intended the damages"
  6. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    98 N.Y.2d 208 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 335 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that indemnity should be allocated pro rata
  7. Frontier Contrs. v. Merchants

    91 N.Y.2d 169 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 279 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding a duty to defend where "Defendants have failed to establish that all of the underlying bodily injury claims satisfy the time and place prerequisites of the [exclusion]"
  8. Zappone v. Home Ins. Co.

    55 N.Y.2d 131 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 404 times
    Concluding that insurer did not have to disclaim coverage for accident involving automobile that was not the subject of the insurance policies in question
  9. Lang v. Hanover Ins. Co.

    3 N.Y.3d 350 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 188 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New York Insurance Law § 3420 allows an injured party to bring a claim directly against an insurer rather than a tortfeasor "only under limited circumstances—[specifically,] the injured party must first obtain a judgment against the tortfeasor, serve the insurance company with a copy of the judgment and await payment for 30 days"
  10. Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. Nat. Fire Ins. Co.; Pitts

    18 Cal.4th 857 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 217 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the temporal limits of the insurer's duty to defend” lies “between tender of the defense and conclusion of the action.”