§Why CasetextPricing

409-411 Sixth Street, LLC, Appellant,v.Masako Mogi, Respondent.

Brief

10 Cited authorities

  1. 300 E. 34th St. Co. v. Habeeb

    248 A.D.2d 50 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)   Cited 242 times
    In Habeeb, the tenant demonstrated a substantial nexus to the subject apartment through witnesses who either lived with the tenant or visited the subject apartment daily and who testified to seeing the tenant in the subject apartment on a daily and nightly basis.

  2. Loughry v. Lincoln Bank

    67 N.Y.2d 369 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 208 times
    Requiring "a high level of general managerial authority in relation to the nature and operation of the employer's business"

  3. Cannon v. Putnam

    76 N.Y.2d 644 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 181 times
    In Cannon, "the defendant decided to have a free standing floodlight installed on his property to illuminate his front yard and its two artificial ponds."

  4. Matter of Y.K

    87 N.Y.2d 430 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that the duty to retreat does "not arise until the point at which deadly physical force was used or imminent."

  5. Universal Leasing Services, Inc. v. Flushing Hae Kwan Restaurant

    169 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)   Cited 62 times
    Noting that "procedural unconscionability concerns the contract formation process, while substantive unconscionability looks to the content of the contract"

  6. 310 East 23rd v. Colvin

    41 A.D.3d 149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 23 times

    No. 1290. June 7, 2007. Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department, entered June 7, 2006, which affirmed a judgment of the Civil Court, New York County (Jerald R. Klein, J.), entered on or about May 26, 2005, after a nonjury trial in a holdover proceeding, in favor of respondent tenant and against petitioner landlord, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Belkin Burden Wenig Goldman, LLP, New York (Magda L. Cruz of counsel), for appellant. Benjamin

  7. Carmine Ltd. v. Gordon

    41 A.D.3d 196 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 20 times
    In Carmine Ltd. v. Gordon, 41 A.D.3d 196, 837 N.Y.S.2d 146 (1st Dept.2007), this Court held for the landlord primarily on the basis of the tenant's low electrical consumption.

  8. Briar Hill Apts. v. Teperman

    165 A.D.2d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)   Cited 31 times
    Finding minimal electrical use

  9. 409-411 Sixth Street, LLC v. Mogi

    100 A.D.3d 112 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 5 times

    2012-10-2 409–411 SIXTH STREET, LLC, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Masako MOGI, Respondent–Appellant. De Castro Law Firm, Woodside (Steven De Castro of counsel), for appellant. Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP, New York (Robert A. Jacobs, Joseph Burden, Sherwin Belkin, Magda L. Cruz and Alana Wrublin of counsel), for respondent. ANGELA M. MAZZARELLI De Castro Law Firm, Woodside (Steven De Castro of counsel), for appellant. Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP, New York (Robert A. Jacobs, Joseph Burden

  10. Morgan Services, Inc. v. Lavan Corporation

    451 N.E.2d 480 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 10 times

    Argued May 2, 1983 Decided June 2, 1983 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, JOSEPH J. RICOTTA, J. Lawrence A. Schulz for appellant. Gerard J. O'Brien for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reducing the total damages awarded to $23,092.06 and, as so modified, should be affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. The Appellate Division having affirmed the Trial Judge's findings that both contracts were breached