§Why CasetextPricing

Busch et al v. Welling et al

MOTION for Summary Judgment

26 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 237,184 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

    492 U.S. 229 (1989)   Cited 3,638 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the continuity prong can be met by showing that related predicate offenses continued over a substantial period of time or posed a threat of continuing activity

  3. Salinas v. United States

    522 U.S. 52 (1997)   Cited 1,213 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the canon of construction requiring a clear statement to alter the federal-state balance of criminal jurisdiction "does not warrant a departure from terms" where the statute's "text . . . is unambiguous on the point under consideration"

  4. Reves v. Ernst Young

    507 U.S. 170 (1993)   Cited 1,419 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant "participates" if he "directs" the pattern of racketeering activity

  5. Odom v. Microsoft Corp.

    486 F.3d 541 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 856 times
    Holding that plaintiffs had sufficiently alleged an association-in-fact enterprise of two corporations

  6. U.S. v. Fernandez

    388 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 475 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that despite the presence of two warring factions, a single conspiracy existed, because the factions "still identified themselves as members" of the gang, "invoked the reputation and power of the group" when dealing with outsiders, "and expected the entire organization to endure beyond the ‘war’ "

  7. Howard v. America Online Inc.

    208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 389 times
    Holding that the RICO bar applies even where the plaintiff does not have standing to sue under securities laws because the plaintiff did not buy or sell securities

  8. Miller v. Hehlen

    209 Ariz. 462 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 137 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for an intangible right to be subject to conversion it must be "merged with a document in the same sense as a stock certificate or an insurance policy."

  9. Walter v. Drayson

    538 F.3d 1244 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 119 times
    Holding that an attorney's provision of services did not satisfy the operation or management test

  10. Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Consumers Union of U.S.

    330 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that plaintiff Suzuki Motors Corp. was required to prove actual malice in a product disparagement suit against Consumers Union, Inc.

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 330,128 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 1962 - Prohibited activities

    18 U.S.C. § 1962   Cited 15,966 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Specifying prohibited activities

  13. Section 1961 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 1961   Cited 14,993 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Defining what the terms “person” and “enterprise” include

  14. Section 12-341.01 - Recovery of attorney fees

    Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-341.01   Cited 2,621 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Permitting an award of reasonable attorney's fees to the successful party in a contested action arising out of express or implied contract

  15. Section 12-341 - Recovery of costs

    Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-341   Cited 971 times
    Authorizing the award of fees to the prevailing party