53 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,946 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Mine Workers v. Gibbs

    383 U.S. 715 (1966)   Cited 18,266 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that supplemental jurisdiction is a "doctrine of discretion"
  3. O'Shea v. Littleton

    414 U.S. 488 (1974)   Cited 4,230 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[p]ast exposure to illegal conduct does not in itself show a present case or controversy regarding injunctive relief ... if unaccompanied by any continuing, present adverse effects"
  4. Mayer v. Belichick

    605 F.3d 223 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 2,532 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding we must only consider documents if complainant's claims are based upon these documents
  5. Meyer v. Holley

    537 U.S. 280 (2003)   Cited 487 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under traditional principles of vicarious liability, a corporation is the principal of its employees/agents, and thus corporate owners and officers are not liable for the unlawful acts of an employee simply on the basis that the owner or officer controlled (or had the right to control) the actions of that employee
  6. Pryor v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

    288 F.3d 548 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,354 times
    Holding that "[a]lthough a district court may not consider matters extraneous to the pleadings, a document integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint may be considered without converting the motion to dismiss in one for summary judgment"
  7. Emerson v. Thiel Coll.

    296 F.3d 184 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,259 times
    Holding that "[b]ecause the individual defendants do not receive federal aid, [plaintiff] does not state a claim against them under the Rehabilitation Act"
  8. Reedy v. Evanson

    615 F.3d 197 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 537 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that liability for a 1983 false arrest claim cannot be sustained unless Appellant shows "that the police officer knowingly and deliberately or with reckless disregard for the truth made false statement"
  9. Growth Horizons, Inc. v. Delaware County

    983 F.2d 1277 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 567 times
    Holding that district court's determination that defendant did not "make unavailable or deny" housing under § 3604(f) was "a judgment on the merits rather than a jurisdictional decision" because the plaintiff's claim, though ultimately unsuccessful, was not frivolous
  10. Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.

    545 U.S. 119 (2005)   Cited 125 times
    Cautioning against reliance on "broad or general language"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,663 times   960 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 64,948 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"
  13. Section 3604 - Discrimination in the sale or rental of housing and other prohibited practices

    42 U.S.C. § 3604   Cited 4,235 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Requiring any "accommodation" in "rules, policies, practices, or services" to be "reasonable"
  14. Section 3601 - Declaration of policy

    42 U.S.C. § 3601   Cited 4,092 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Stating the FHA is intended to provide “fair housing throughout the United States”
  15. Section 12182 - Prohibition of discrimination by public accommodations

    42 U.S.C. § 12182   Cited 4,051 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that public accommodations cannot "directly or through contractual or other arrangements, utilize standards or criteria or methods of administration" that have the effect of discriminating on the basis of disability."
  16. Section 12181 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 12181   Cited 3,621 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Including "grocery store" and "pharmac[ies]" whose operations "affect commerce" within the definition of "public accommodation"
  17. Section 12188 - Enforcement

    42 U.S.C. § 12188   Cited 1,385 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the remedies available to individuals are set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 2000a-3, which allows a private right of action only for injunctive relief for violations of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
  18. Section 3602 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 3602   Cited 1,212 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Defining familial status
  19. Section 36.202 - Activities

    28 C.F.R. § 36.202   Cited 196 times
    Requiring public accommodations to provide an "equal" opportunity for the hearing impaired to participate in and benefit from services
  20. Section 36.204 - Administrative methods

    28 C.F.R. § 36.204   Cited 4 times

    A public accommodation shall not, directly or through contractual or other arrangements, utilize standards or criteria or methods of administration that have the effect of discriminating on the basis of disability, or that perpetuate the discrimination of others who are subject to common administrative control. 28 C.F.R. § 36.204