Windy City v. CIT Tech. Fin. Servs.
536 F.3d 663 (7th Cir. 2008) Cited 664 timesHolding that "unfair" practices claims are not subject to Rule 9(b) pleading because "neither fraud nor mistake is an element of unfair conduct under" the ICFA
Medcom Holding v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories
984 F.2d 223 (7th Cir. 1993) Cited 63 timesInterpreting Illinois contract law
State v. Seymour
183 Wis. 2d 683 (Wis. 1994) Cited 16 times 1 Legal AnalysesNo. 91-2962-CR. Oral argument March 31, 1994. — Decided May 25, 1994. REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. For the defendant-appellant there was a brief by John M. Brinckman and John M. Brinckman Associates, LaCrosse and oral argument by John M. Brinckman. For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Mary Burke, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs were Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general and James E. Doyle, attorney general. (Affirming
Strank v. Mercy Hospital of Johnstown
383 Pa. 54 (Pa. 1955) Cited 20 timesSuggesting a writ of mandamus will not issue to enforce a right based solely on contract and not on law
Kingwood Oil Co. v. Bell
204 F.2d 8 (7th Cir. 1953) Cited 13 timesIn Kingwood, we stated, page 13, `No matter how likely it may seem that a plaintiff may be unable to prove his case, he is entitled, upon averring a claim, to an opportunity to prove it.
Wilson v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
147 F. Supp. 513 (N.D. Ill. 1957) Cited 8 timesNo. 56 C 919. January 16, 1957. R. Tieken, U.S. Atty., Nicholas G. Manos, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff. H. J. Deany, Robert S. Kirby, Chicago, Ill., for defendant. HOFFMAN, District Judge. This action has been considered upon the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint under the provisions of Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The action was brought to redress an alleged violation of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, as amended, 50 U.S.C
Rogers v. Dwight
145 F. Supp. 537 (E.D. Wis. 1956) Cited 6 timesNo. 55-C-326. November 6, 1956. Hugh M. Matchett, Frank E. O'Reilly, Chicago, Ill., Brooke Tibbs, Milwaukee. Wis., for plaintiffs. Wolfe, O'Leary Kenney, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendants. GRUBB, District Judge. This action is before the court on defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Count I of the complaint is brought under the provisions of Chapter 43, § 135, of the Illinois Revised Statutes, commonly
Temperato v. Rainbolt
163 F. Supp. 744 (E.D. Ill. 1957) Cited 1 times163 F.Supp. 744 (E.D.Ill. 1957) 119 U.S.P.Q. 68 Samuel J. TEMPERATO, Plaintiff, v. Roy C. RAINBOLT, Defendant. Civ. No. 3887. United States District Court, E.D. Illinois Oct. 28, 1957 Blumenfelds&s Abrams, St. Louis, Mo., Baker, Kagys&sWagner, East St. Louis, Ill., for plaintiff. Zeno Middleton, East St. Louis, Ill., Dreman & Sterling, Belleville, Ill., for defendant. JUERGENS, District Judge. The complaint alleges that on or about May 25, 1950, defendant contracted with one W. J. Lanahan for license
Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Cited 163,896 times 197 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
Section 943.20 - Theft
Wis. Stat. § 943.20 Cited 348 times 8 Legal AnalysesDefining theft to include the intentional use, transfer, concealment, or retention of possession of money "without the owner's consent, contrary to his or her authority, and with intent to convert ... to the use of any other person except the owner"
Section 895.446 - Property damage or loss caused by crime; action for
Wis. Stat. § 895.446 Cited 159 timesCreating a civil cause of action for victims of theft