Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (1993) Cited 26,362 times 228 Legal AnalysesHolding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.
108 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 1997) Cited 683 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that defendants cannot be liable for false advertising when they were not "responsible for disseminating the offending advertisements"
Monsanto v. David
516 F.3d 1009 (Fed. Cir. 2008) Cited 51 timesHolding that "the technology fee is not an established royalty for the infringing act of saving seed"
Inline Connection Corp. v. AOL Time Warner Inc.
470 F. Supp. 2d 435 (D. Del. 2007) Cited 16 timesHolding that expert report was admissible under Daubert where AICPA guidelines permitted experts to rely upon facts and assumptions provided by the experts' client
Dal-Tile Corporation v. U.S.
Court No. 95-05-00679, Slip Op. 04-24 (Ct. Int'l Trade Mar. 16, 2004) Cited 2 timesCourt No. 95-05-00679, Slip Op. 04-24 March 16, 2004 Joseph S. Kaplan, McGuireWoods LLP, New York City, NY, for the plaintiff Peter D. Keisler, Barbara S. Williams, Saul Davis, Beth C. Brotman, for the defendant John F. Bruce, Howrey Simon Arnold White LLP, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Tile Council of America R. KENTON MUSGRAVE, Judge [On classification dispute over whether imported wall file from Mexico meets statutory test for "ceramic" and is entitled to duty-free entry under the Generalized
Rule 703 - Bases of an Expert's Opinion Testimony
Fed. R. Evid. 703 Cited 4,736 times 26 Legal AnalysesExplaining that facts or data of a type upon which experts in the field would reasonably rely in forming an opinion need not be admissible in order for the expert's opinion based on the facts and data to be admitted
Rule 807 - Residual Exception
Fed. R. Evid. 807 Cited 1,564 times 11 Legal AnalysesRequiring "sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness" under the residual exception to the hearsay rule