§Why CasetextPricing

Brim v. Dell Financial Services, LLC et al

RESPONSE to Motion re MOTION in Limine 1,2,3 and 6

3 Cited authorities

  1. Saunders v. Branch Banking

    526 F.3d 142 (4th Cir. 2008)   Cited 372 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a bank's internal records of ongoing correspondence could support a conclusion that the bank intended not to furnish accurate information to the reporting agencies

  2. Saunders v. Equifax Information Services, L.L.C.

    469 F. Supp. 2d 343 (E.D. Va. 2007)   Cited 13 times
    Denying motion for remittitur of punitive damages award in FCRA case where jury was instructed about purpose of awarding punitive damages and "the salient factors they could consider in making any award" including "[d]efendant's income and net worth" and where jury based decision on sufficient evidence of misconduct and "the economic ability (substantial net worth) of the offending defendant to withstand such an award"

  3. Section 1681s-2 - Responsibilities of furnishers of information to consumer reporting agencies

    15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2   Cited 3,007 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Granting enforcement power to state and federal regulators