Poplar Grove, Etc. v. Bache Halsey Stuart

Holding that a district court has discretion to allow a stay without posting a bond if the judgment debtor “demonstrates a present financial ability to facilely respond to a money judgment and presents to the court a financially secure plan for maintaining the same degree of solvency during the period of appeal” or “the judgment debtor's present financial condition is such that the posting of a full bond would impose an undue financial burden.”

Fed. Presc. Serv. v. Am. Pharm. Ass'n

Holding that Rule 62(d) allows appellant to obtain a stay as a matter of right by posting a supersedeas bond, but does not prohibit district court from authorizing unsecured stays

Matter of Combined Metals Reduction Co.

Holding that appeals are moot when appellate courts can provide no effective relief

Chalfonte Condominium Apartment Ass'n v. QBE Insurance

In Chalfonte, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit certified the following question, among others, to the Florida Supreme Court: "Does Florida law recognize a claim for breach of the implied warranty of good faith and fair dealing by an insured against its insurer based on the insurer's failure to investigate and assess the insured's claim within a reasonable period of time?"

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes

In Transworld Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 312 F.Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1970), modified on appeal, 449 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1971), rev'd on other grounds, 409 U.S. 363, 93 S.Ct. 647, 34 L.Ed.2d 577 (1973), the District Court adopted the "generally accepted factors to be weighed in determining a reasonable attorney's fee" from Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 245 F. Supp. 258 (M.D.Pa. 1965), vacated on other grounds, 377 F.2d 776 (3d Cir. 1967), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 392 U.S. 481, 88 S.Ct. 2224, 20 L.Ed.2d 1231 (1968), viz.

C. Albert Sauter Co., Inc. v. Richard S. Sauter Co., Inc.

In C. Albert Sauter Co. v. Richard S. Sauter Co., 368 F. Supp. 501, 514 (E.D.Pa. 1973), the court sustained a jury's verdict that defendants violated the antitrust laws where "plaintiff alleged and proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendants conspired, agreed or had an understanding to engage in acts of unfair competition with the intent to injure plaintiff as a competitor by impairing plaintiff's ability to compete in interstate commerce."

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes

Holding that a party may recover costs of a letter of credit and auditing costs paid in lieu of a supersedeas bond premium, where the "obtaining of a supersedeas bond was impracticable"

Redding Company v. Russwine Constr. Corp.

Holding that a default judgment that was non-final for the purposes of Rule 54(b) was not subject to execution

Blackwelder v. Crooks

Rule 62 - Stay of Proceedings to Enforce a Judgment

Granting of stay is discretionary

Rule 8 - Stay or Injunction Pending Appeal

Referring to interim relief from “the judgment or order of a district court pending appeal” as “a stay”