§Why CasetextPricing

Briggs v. United States of America et al

Reply to Opposition 31

41 Cited authorities

  1. United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty

    445 U.S. 388 (1980)   Cited 2,013 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding even a named plaintiff whose individual claims are moot retains a "personal stake" in representing the class jurisdictionally sufficient to appeal the denial of class certification

  2. Sosna v. Iowa

    419 U.S. 393 (1975)   Cited 1,733 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the requisite Article III "case or controversy" may exist "between a named defendant and a member of the class represented by the named plaintiff, even though the claim of the named plaintiff has become moot"

  3. Bowen v. Massachusetts

    487 U.S. 879 (1988)   Cited 1,039 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that monetary relief was equitable because it sought reimbursement to which the State was allegedly already entitled, rather than money in compensation for losses suffered

  4. Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank v. Roper

    445 U.S. 326 (1980)   Cited 987 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denial of class certification is appealable after entry of final judgment

  5. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.

    345 U.S. 629 (1953)   Cited 2,223 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, although defendant had "disclaimed any intention" to revive the challenged conduct, "[s]uch a profession does not suffice to make a case moot although it is one of the factors to be considered in determining the appropriateness of granting an injunction against the now-discontinued acts"

  6. Public Util. Com'n of St., Cal. v. F.E.R.C

    100 F.3d 1451 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 213 times
    Holding that for mootness purposes, a party satisfies the Article III case or controversy requirement by continuing to suffer collateral legal consequences of the action being appealed

  7. Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.

    975 F.2d 964 (3d Cir. 1992)   Cited 219 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the named plaintiff has the requisite personal stake in class certification only if he has a live individual claim when the district court decides the class certification issue, or at the very least, he had a live claim when he filed for class certification . . ."

  8. Sopcak v. Northern Mountain Helicopter Service

    52 F.3d 817 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 201 times
    Holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by denying discovery where "rather than moving for extension of time to oppose the dismissal motion, the Appellants filed an opposition which stated in part: '[h]owever, if the court believes that there is not sufficient evidence to support plaintiff's' jurisdictional allegation, plaintiff's respectfully request an opportunity to conduct discovery'"

  9. Hodge v. Dalton

    107 F.3d 705 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 149 times
    Holding that a final rule "in character with the original proposal" is a logical outgrowth

  10. Tucson Airport Auth. v. General Dynam. Corp.

    136 F.3d 641 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 129 times
    Holding when constitutional claims are premised on the notion that the United States has some contractual obligation to the plaintiff that it has failed to satisfy, the claims are contractually based and must be heard in the Court of Federal Claims

  11. Section 1391 - Venue generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1391   Cited 27,824 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred

  12. Section 1346 - United States as defendant

    28 U.S.C. § 1346   Cited 24,041 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Determining liability to the claimant "in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred"

  13. Section 1292 - Interlocutory decisions

    28 U.S.C. § 1292   Cited 22,309 times   193 Legal Analyses
    Granting appellate jurisdiction over the denial of an injunction

  14. Section 1631 - Transfer to cure want of jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1631   Cited 7,656 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to transfer action to court with proper jurisdiction

  15. Section 702 - Right of review

    5 U.S.C. § 702   Cited 7,053 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting judicial review of "agency action"

  16. Section 1402 - United States as defendant

    28 U.S.C. § 1402   Cited 866 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that any action filed in district court against the United States "may be prosecuted only . . . in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides"

  17. Section 2805 - Enforcement provisions

    15 U.S.C. § 2805   Cited 362 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a franchisee may bring a "civil action" against a franchisor for violations of section 2802