17 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,796 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,848 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Zehr v. Haugen

    318 Or. 647 (Or. 1994)   Cited 50 times
    Concluding that plaintiff stated claim for breach of contract by alleging that physician agreed to perform tubal ligation but failed to do so, and stating that, "where the parties have agreed upon the performance expected by the plaintiff and promised by the defendant in terms that commit the defendant to that performance without reference to, and irrespective of, any general standard of care, the defendant may be liable on the contract whether or not he or she was negligent"
  4. Vejo v. Portland Pub. Sch.

    204 F. Supp. 3d 1149 (D. Or. 2016)   Cited 19 times
    Finding disclaimer that reserved college's right to change fees, admission and graduation requirements, and regulations affecting the student body did not absolve contractual duty to uphold nondiscrimination laws because a reasonable juror could conclude the college did not retain the right "to rescind its nondiscrimination promise and begin making discriminatory decisions based on a student's race, national origin, or religion"
  5. Gibson v. Walden University, LLC

    66 F. Supp. 3d 1322 (D. Or. 2014)   Cited 9 times
    Finding no contract existed where student handbook included a disclaimer that "[n]either the provisions of this document, nor the acceptance of students through registration and enrollment in the university, constitutes a contract or an offer of a contract"
  6. Lahmann v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of Eagles

    202 Or. App. 123 (Or. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 11 times
    Holding there is a two part inquiry for determining if an entity is a public accommodation: first, whether the organization provides goods and services to the public; and second, whether the organization is "distinctly private"
  7. Real Estate Loan Fund v. Hevner

    76 Or. App. 349 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 31 times

    47695; CA A31647 Argued and submitted January 18, 1985. Reversed and remanded November 14, 1985. Appeal from Circuit Court, Lincoln County, Charles P. Littlehales, Judge. Kathleen A. Evans, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant. Taisto Pesola, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Michael S. McLaughlin, Certified Law Student, Salem. Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges. VAN HOOMISSEN, J. Reversed and remanded. VAN HOOMISSEN

  8. Petitions for Review

    304 Or. 55 (Or. 1987)   Cited 28 times

    August 24, 1987.

  9. Bird v. Lewis Clark College

    104 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (D. Or. 2000)   Cited 12 times
    In Bird, 104 F. Supp. 2d at 1274, the district court found that the plaintiff could bring claims under the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") against an American college for alleged discrimination that occurred while the plaintiff studied abroad.
  10. Graham v. Kold Kist Beverage Ice, Inc.

    43 Or. App. 1037 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)   Cited 20 times
    Finding that a wholesale ice machine company was not a place of public accommodation because it did not offer its services to the public, but only to a small group of retail stores
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,487 times   960 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,896 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Section 659A.142 - Discrimination against individual with disability by employment agency, labor organization, place of public accommodation or state government prohibited; discrimination in provision of healthcare; mental disorder treatment not evidence of inability to manage property

    ORS § 659A.142   Cited 49 times

    (1) As used in this section: (a) "Health care facility" has the meaning given that term in ORS 442.015. (b) "Health professional regulatory board" has the meaning given that term in ORS 676.160. (c) "Medical resources" includes but is not limited to: (A) Medical devices or equipment. (B) Prescription drugs. (C) Laboratory testing. (d) "Provider" means: (A) An individual licensed or certified by a health professional regulatory board. (B) A health care facility. (e) "State government" has the meaning

  14. Section 659A.400 - Place of public accommodation defined

    ORS § 659A.400   Cited 30 times
    Defining places of public accommodation for purposes of ORS 659A.403 to include places offering “amusements”