25 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 218,869 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.

    504 U.S. 451 (1992)   Cited 2,308 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "it is clearly reasonable to infer that [the defendant] has market power to raise prices and drive out competition in the aftermarkets" for service and parts despite an undisputed lack of market power in the initial product
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.

    37 F.3d 1069 (5th Cir. 1994)   Cited 12,564 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a mere scintilla of evidence does not create a genuine issue of material fact
  4. T.O. Stanley Boot Co. v. Bank of El Paso

    847 S.W.2d 218 (Tex. 1993)   Cited 734 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[w]here an essential term is open for future negotiation, there is no binding contract"
  5. Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema Reed, L.L.P.

    22 S.W.3d 857 (Tex. 2000)   Cited 460 times
    Holding that for an ambiguity to exist, more than conflicting interpretations must exist; such interpretations must both be reasonable
  6. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Starkey

    41 F.3d 1018 (5th Cir. 1995)   Cited 174 times
    Affirming district court's denial of motion for leave to file motion to dismiss where defendant waived insufficiency of process by failing to raise it in answer
  7. World Help v. Leisure Lifestyles

    977 S.W.2d 662 (Tex. App. 1998)   Cited 106 times
    Holding party who purchased vendor's and deed of trust liens knowing taxes were due on property and subsequently paid taxes was not equitably subrogated to tax liens
  8. Atkinson Gas Co. v. Albrecht

    878 S.W.2d 236 (Tex. App. 1994)   Cited 90 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that RRC severance order was not a force majeure event because it was issued for lessee's failure to timely file production reports
  9. Forney 921 Lot Dev. v. Paul Taylor Homes

    349 S.W.3d 258 (Tex. App. 2011)   Cited 43 times
    Holding quasi-estoppel precluded contracting party from exercising its statutory right to terminate a contract
  10. Austin v. Countrywide

    261 S.W.3d 68 (Tex. App. 2008)   Cited 48 times
    Upholding denial of motion to compel when movant did not specify undisclosed responsive documents or how these documents were relevant
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 333,232 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 160,289 times   196 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,441 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"
  14. Section 38.001 - Recovery of Attorney's Fees

    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 38.001   Cited 1,168 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Providing for the recovery of attorney's fees in suit to enforce a written contract