9 Cited authorities

  1. In re Cavanaugh

    306 F.3d 726 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 354 times
    Holding that that options traders can satisfy the typicality requirement and serve as a lead plaintiff
  2. In re Worldcom, Inc. Securities Litigation

    294 F. Supp. 2d 392 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)   Cited 161 times
    Holding that the lead plaintiff, a stockholder, had standing to assert Section 11 claims on behalf of investors in WorldCom's note offerings where "claims addressed specifically to the [note] offerings rely on the same course of conduct that underlies the claims addressed more generally to WorldCom's securities . . . ."
  3. In re Enron Corp. Securities Litigation

    314 B.R. 354 (S.D. Tex. 2002)   Cited 113 times
    Finding that filing of additional information after sixty-day period "did not violate the spirit or purpose of the PSLRA and its express time deadlines" because requisite information about group member had been included in earlier filing and therefore amendment "did not 'supplement' the group"
  4. Weinberg v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

    216 F.R.D. 248 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)   Cited 69 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting joint application of an individual investor and an institutional plaintiff because there is "no need to have them both as Lead Plaintiff"
  5. Sofran v. LaBranche & Co., Inc.

    220 F.R.D. 398 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)   Cited 31 times
    Rejecting the argument that because the proposed lead plaintiff was not the beneficial owner of the shares that it could not serve as an adequate lead plaintiff
  6. In re McKesson HBOC, Inc. Securities Litigation

    97 F. Supp. 2d 993 (N.D. Cal. 1999)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that it was inappropriate to count losses or profits by "in-and-out" traders and assuming a constant fraud premium despite movant's argument that partial disclosures may have begun seeping into the pool of information available to the investors
  7. In re Comdisco Securities Litigation

    150 F. Supp. 2d 943 (N.D. Ill. 2001)   Cited 26 times
    Rejecting application of FIFO methodology and finding that net seller's transactions during the class period "caused it to derive unwitting benefits rather than true losses from the alleged securities fraud"
  8. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 35,573 times   1241 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  9. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,592 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party